0
Religion staes what it knows as the truth and sifts facts to confirm its position (discarding contradictory evidence). Science observes the real world and attempts to find the explanation by testing theories that eventually may explain the observations - there are no right or wrong choices on data validity.
What else can I help you with?
When did Albert Einstein say 'science without religion is lame religion without science is blind?
Albert Einstein said, "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind" in his 1954 essay "Science and Religion." In the essay, he emphasized the importance of understanding and integrating both science and religion for a more holistic view of the world.
How will you prove that religion without science is lame and science without religion is blind?
Sumit vashishtha
I believed science and religion are related who am i?
You might identify as a theist or a spiritual scientist, someone who sees a connection between scientific inquiry and religious belief. This perspective often emphasizes that both science and religion seek to understand the world and our place in it, albeit through different methodologies and frameworks. You may also align with philosophies such as process theology or integral theory, which advocate for a harmonious relationship between faith and empirical evidence.
What did Einstein mean by science without religion is lame religion without science is blind?
well, why don't you take a minute and think about it. Science is constantly proving religion wrong and it gives science an underlying purpose to keep moving forward with its work in every category while religion is constantly revising its interpretations of an apparently flawless book. While at the same time religion needs science because it does actually explain how some of the "miracles" could have occured if the people in the stories were the thinking kind of people who could predict wind patterns and sun locations. In short, they need each other I have a slightly different take on this subject. With regards to the first half of the statement, "science without religion is lame", I equate the statement to mean that science would be uninspiring and dull without religion. I infer this interpretation because of another of his quotes, "We should take care not to make the intellect our god; it has, of course, powerful muscles, but no personality." The second part of of the statement, "religion without science is blind", may be paraphrased as theories or attitudes held by people or organizations can go off in the wrong direction if not subjected to a structured and systematic study. Just my 2 cents.
What caused conflict between science and the romantic Catholic Church?
The birth and growth of science led to the conflict between scientists and the church.
Why is there no contradiction between faith and science?
Though faith is above reason, there can never be a contradiction between faith and science because both originate in God. It is God himself who gives to us the light both of reason and of faith.
What were the conflict between science and religion in 19th century?
The conflict between science and religion in 19th century was about the creation accounts.
Why is there a debate between science and religion?
There's nothing special about opposing points of view. There are debates between science and science, and debates between religion and religion as well. For as long we don't know all the absolute truths, and possibly even after that, people will disagree.
Is there any contradiction between science and religion?
Yes...I suppose there are many contradictions. On of the biggest one is Evolution vs. Creationism. Science believes in the Theory of Evolution which is saying that all complex organisms developed from simpler organism. Most religions, believe in Creationism, which is that God designed and created everything.
What are some popular books one can purchase which delve into the relationship between Science and Religion?
There are many books that delve into the relationship between science and religion; however, many of these books have a bias towards science or a bias towards religion. Some books that delve into the relationship between science and religion are "Science and Christianity: Conflict or Coherence?" by Henry F. Schaefer III and "Rock of Ages: Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life" by Stephen Jay Gould.
Is there a connection between religion and science?
there isn't a connection between sience and religion but with hindis there is a prediction with the moons and stars
What is the distinction between science and religion?
The distinction between science and religion lies in their methods of seeking knowledge and understanding. Science relies on empirical evidence, experimentation, and observation to explain the natural world, while religion is based on faith, belief in the supernatural, and spiritual teachings.
What conflicts exist between freedom of religion and public education?
the inability of science and religion to blend
What has the author Frank M Turner written?
Frank M. Turner has written: 'Between science and religion' -- subject(s): Religion and science, England, History
Is religion more powerful science?
Religion is not a science.
What apparent contradiction between limited resources and unlimited wants?
Explain the apparent contradiction between limited resources and unlimited wants.
What is the dialog between religion and science?
Religion and science, at least in the absolute sense(where it is assumed that having religious believes is a form of non-education) are incompatible. Religion offers certainty where none exists, science finds new ways to prove itself wrong.
