First of all, the Earth is not a living organism and therefore cannot be killed. It can be destroyed, by, say, a collision with an asteroid the size of Texas. Or, as the first post mentions, the explosion of our own sun. But, second, global warming cannot destroy the Earth.
If temperatures keep increasing for the next 10,000 years (depending on the rate of temperature increase - at the current rate it will take 10,000 years), all life on Earth (with the exception of a few microscopic organisms) will become extinct. But the Earth will still be here.
That said, "global warming" is completely natural in origin. Just like it has always been, throughout the Earth's history. In fact, it has happened three times in just the last 3,500 years, and the current event falls right in line with the cycle. There is absolutely nothing unique about either the current temperature levels or the rate at which temperatures are increasing. Several hundred times in the last 10,000 years, temperatures have been higher than they are now. And at least 50 times in the last 10,000 years, temperatures have changed more rapidly than they are changing now.
We know that the Earth's natural climate system is dominated by negative feedbacks. After 5 billion years of climate change, caused by thousands of meteor impacts, orbital wobbles, polar reversals, insterstellar dust clouds, nearby supernova, and a dozen other natural causes, the Earth is still here, and there is still life on it. If the system was dominated by positive feedbacks, the first meteor impact of any size would have set of a chain of events that, within a hundred years, would have caused runaway climate change, and all life on Earth would have perished. Clearly, that never happened. And therefore, the climate system is not dominated by positive feedbacks.
Rest assured, the current warming trend will reverse itself shortly. In fact, it appears that the reversal has already begun. For all we know, a La Nina is part of the Earth's negative feedback system. In any event, we know that all natural warming events in the past have eventually reversed themselves. And since the current warming is natural, it too will reverse itself.
Not really but it will expand at the end of its' life and will engulf the Earth as well as many of the planets.
the presence of liquid water on Earth's surface, which enables life to exist. Other planets in our solar system are either too hot or too cold to support liquid water on their surfaces, making Earth unique in its ability to sustain a diverse range of organisms.
The 2 inner ones are too hot for life, the outer 4 are too cold. Only Earth & Mars are within the "temperate" zone ... (and actually both are outside it - except for our atmosphere we'd be too cold too) and Mars has too little air for survival.
If the sun became to hot, for example if it became a red giant, the entire diameter of the sun would easily reach within 5000 meters of the earth. INSTANTLY INCINERATING EVERYTHING THAT EXISTS IN YOUR LIFE YOU PROBABLY WILL WANT TO KILL YOURSELF FOR THE FACT REMAINS WE ALL WILL DIE.
The atmosphere trapping energy from the sun is essential for regulating Earth's temperature and creating a climate suitable for life. This process helps maintain a stable temperature range by trapping some of the sun's heat, preventing the Earth from becoming too hot or too cold. This ultimately supports the development of ecosystems and sustains life on our planet.
Too hot and no atmosphere.
No. It is far too hot and the pressure far too great
Earth is just the right temperature for liquid water and life. It is not too hot and not too cold.
No. Earth is the only planet known to support life. Venus is too hot.
If the sun were closer, Earth would be too hot for life to survive, as temperatures would be too high. If the sun were farther away, Earth would be too cold for life to exist, as temperatures would be too low. The distance between Earth and the sun is crucial for maintaining the ideal conditions for life.
Not really but it will expand at the end of its' life and will engulf the Earth as well as many of the planets.
Earth is the only planet we know of that has life because on other planets the atmosphere won't let us breathe in it and they are either too cold or too hot. ~Dan
No. Venus is too hot to support any sort of life. Earth is the only planet known to have life on it.
This refers to life as we know it. Little is yet known about life on other planets. In this case, Earth is neither to close to the Sun, nor too far away, therefore, it is neither too hot nor too cold.
Goldilocks's porridge was not too hot, not too cold but just right. The Earth is not too hot (like Venus) and not too cold (like Mars), but just right. It isn't surprising because life developed on Earth so it got used to the conditions at an early stage.
Out of control means the earth will be too hot for life.
Yes. Magma comes from the center of the Earth, and magma is very hot. That indicates that the inside of the Earth must be hot too.