Dr. A.J.E. Cave gave a paper at the International Congress of zoology in 1958 in which he concluded that a skeleton found in France was not an Neanderthal but was of an elderly human who suffered from Arthritis. The implication is that Neanderthals never existed.
World population growth rate in recent times is about 2% per year. Practicable application of growth rate throughout human history would be about half that number. Wars, disease, famine, etc. have wiped out approximately one third of the population on average every 82 years. Starting with eight people, and applying these growth rates since the Flood of Noah's day (about 4500 years ago) would give a total human population at just under six billion people. However, application on an evolutionary time scale runs into major difficulties. Starting with one "couple" just 41,000 years ago would give us a total population of 2 x 1089. 9The universe does not have space to hold so many bodies.
Because we know the moon is real, we have the technology to get there, god on the other hand is not real and there is no way to prove that he is real, it's like trying to prove the tooth fairy is real
Yes, stars are real. They are massive celestial objects made primarily of hydrogen and helium that generate light and heat through nuclear reactions in their cores. Stars are fundamental to the structure and evolution of galaxies, including our own Milky Way.
I choose to believe that it isn't and you should believe the same. Don't question such a historic landmark unless you have facts to prove otherwise. Yes, there have been documentaries and people coming up with absurd statements. These documentaries are there to make money.
Yes, he is a real deity in Greek Mythology, the religion of ancient Mediterranean peoples.AnswernoAnswer:A religions' god(s) are real to its adherents. In the case of Zeus he had his followers and believers (and may still have some) and so he was real to them. There is no defendable test to prove the existence of any god and all must be regarded as equally real or unreal to an unbiased observer.
Life Cycle of a Star
to prove evolution
used to prove the analogous homologous characteristics of evolution
Creationism is religious dogma. Nothing proves its correctness. As any scientist with a dictionary would tell you, nothing proves evolution either. But there is a heck of a lot of evidence and testing that suggests it is about as right as we can get.
No, of course not. Evidence does not prove evolution - it validates the theory.Evidence which Darwin had included limited fossils, and observed apparent speciation in birds.
There is no proof it actually happened nor that it was created. Evolution has been disproved but creation has not. How do we know what really happened? It was thousands of years ago for crying out loud!!!
It isn't prove that it is real or not real
Science has no capacity to completely prove something... However these are some facts that make it likely to be true. - An extensive fossil record which completely conforms to predictions. - Observing evolution in action (such as the flu virus changing ever year, the HIV virus changing all the time, speciation in plants and animals in non-lab environments, lab experiments etc). - Paternity testing (the techniques used in paternity testing are also used to demonstrate how closely related different species are). - DNA (all organisms use the exact same code for proteins) - similarities in phylogeny (why do we share so many features with other organisms?) - similarities in DNA conform to the predictions made by evolution
it depend if you want them to be or not if not look to the science facts about there is no logical explanation for turning people to stone. If you want them to exist say to the people who say they dont exist : PROVE IT
No facts currently known to science contradict the fundamental theses of evolutionary theory.
A form of propaganda. You gather a huge array of facts, most of them true, to prove your point. But you carefully censor out another array of facts that prove you're wrong. It's a form of deceit that contains no actual lies.
Yes. However, it is possible to PROVE the validity of evolution on an evidential basis.
yes.