There are several speculative ideas in astronomy, which can't currently be proved - nor completely disproved. Some of these include wormholes; parallel universes; the possibility of time travel and faster-than-light travel.
'Dark matter' and 'dark energy' have not been observed or proven yet.
Astronomers are unable to prove the existence of dark matter & dark energy.In fact astronomers have not yet proved most astronomical effects. Worm holes, black holes, or even the big bang. But proof in theories is almost impossible. The longer a theory stays intact is a sign of it's "proof" but some "sane" theories have been proven to be incorrect - "Einsteins biggest blunder".No scientist will say they have proved anything "astronomical" as it is almost impossible to prove anything without physical interaction.It's a bit like saying "I can prove that dogs live in the next street" based on only hearing their barks and not actually going there.
Yes, the existence of the moon can be confirmed through observations made with telescopes and even with the naked eye. Its gravitational influence on Earth, causing tides, and various spacecraft missions that have flown to and orbited the moon also provide evidence of its existence.
Since the beginning of astronomy. Astronomers are ALWAYS looking for new things.
As astronaut travels into outer space and some have been killed doing so. Most astronomers stay on the planet Earth and look up into space. There have been astronauts who are astronomers, but, most astronomers are not astronauts. There have been tens of millions of astronomers looking up at outer space, but, only a few hundred astronauts. No, they are not the same.
'Dark matter' and 'dark energy' have not been observed or proven yet.
'Dark matter' and 'dark energy' have not been observed or proven yet.
Astronomers are unable to prove the existence of dark matter & dark energy.In fact astronomers have not yet proved most astronomical effects. Worm holes, black holes, or even the big bang. But proof in theories is almost impossible. The longer a theory stays intact is a sign of it's "proof" but some "sane" theories have been proven to be incorrect - "Einsteins biggest blunder".No scientist will say they have proved anything "astronomical" as it is almost impossible to prove anything without physical interaction.It's a bit like saying "I can prove that dogs live in the next street" based on only hearing their barks and not actually going there.
Black Holes
Search the Wikipedia for "Unsolved problems in astronomy". One such problem is, how does the Sun's corona heat up to a temperature that is much higher than the photosphere. Although there are some ideas how this happens, the details aren't quite clear yet.
AnswerMany have tried to prove God exists. Some of the suggestions have been that God 'must' have created the world, the Bible contains prophecies or even that God exists because the Bible says so. But no one has ever provided undeniable proof that God exists.
Astronomers make predictions about celestial events based on theories and observations. Some predictions that have been proved include the existence of black holes and the existence of exoplanets. Some predictions that have been disproved include certain theories about the behavior of dark matter and the nature of certain astronomical phenomena.
Yes, the existence of the moon can be confirmed through observations made with telescopes and even with the naked eye. Its gravitational influence on Earth, causing tides, and various spacecraft missions that have flown to and orbited the moon also provide evidence of its existence.
We can get information from any portion of the electromagnetic spectrum provided we use the correct "listening" devices; that is the entire range, Radio, microwave, infrared, visible, ultra violet, xray, and gamma rays
Only astronauts have been to the moon.
If there were any proof of the existence of God, it would not require faith to believe in him - it would be a fact that no reasonable person would deny. After almost two thousand years, theologians are still unable to prove that God even exists, so some among us feel that they have been given long enough to make their case, and that God does not exist.
It is not possible to prove God doesn't exist, just as we can't prove fairies, elves and unicorns don't exist. The inability to prove something doesn't exist does not therefore mean that it does exist. It is not possible to prove that there is no teapot in orbit around Pluto, yet the lack of such a proof doesn't mean that the teapot therefore exists. There have been several attempts to prove that God exists using logic (eg Kalam cosmological argument, Transcendental Argument for God [TAG]), but these are not universally accepted as valid and true - if they were then there'd be no need for any further discussion.