0
What have Astronomers have been unable to prove that what exist?
Wiki User
∙ 6y ago
'Dark matter' and 'dark energy' have not been observed or proven yet.
Anabelle Hand
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Astronomers have been unable to prove it exists?
Astronomers are unable to prove the existence of dark matter & dark energy.In fact astronomers have not yet proved most astronomical effects. Worm holes, black holes, or even the big bang. But proof in theories is almost impossible. The longer a theory stays intact is a sign of it's "proof" but some "sane" theories have been proven to be incorrect - "Einsteins biggest blunder".No scientist will say they have proved anything "astronomical" as it is almost impossible to prove anything without physical interaction.It's a bit like saying "I can prove that dogs live in the next street" based on only hearing their barks and not actually going there.
What is astronomers have been unable to prove that it exists?
There are several speculative ideas in astronomy, which can't currently be proved - nor completely disproved. Some of these include wormholes; parallel universes; the possibility of time travel and faster-than-light travel.
Are astronauts and astronomers the same?
As astronaut travels into outer space and some have been killed doing so. Most astronomers stay on the planet Earth and look up into space. There have been astronauts who are astronomers, but, most astronomers are not astronauts. There have been tens of millions of astronomers looking up at outer space, but, only a few hundred astronauts. No, they are not the same.
How long have astronomers been looking for a new planet?
Since the beginning of astronomy. Astronomers are ALWAYS looking for new things.
What has actually been seen by Astronomers?
A black hole, exoplanets. It has always been inferred.
What had Astronomers have been unable to prove that it exists?
'Dark matter' and 'dark energy' have not been observed or proven yet.
Astronomers have been unable to prove it exists?
Astronomers are unable to prove the existence of dark matter & dark energy.In fact astronomers have not yet proved most astronomical effects. Worm holes, black holes, or even the big bang. But proof in theories is almost impossible. The longer a theory stays intact is a sign of it's "proof" but some "sane" theories have been proven to be incorrect - "Einsteins biggest blunder".No scientist will say they have proved anything "astronomical" as it is almost impossible to prove anything without physical interaction.It's a bit like saying "I can prove that dogs live in the next street" based on only hearing their barks and not actually going there.
What is astronomers have been unable to prove that it exists?
There are several speculative ideas in astronomy, which can't currently be proved - nor completely disproved. Some of these include wormholes; parallel universes; the possibility of time travel and faster-than-light travel.
What is something that astronomers have been unable to prove?
Search the Wikipedia for "Unsolved problems in astronomy". One such problem is, how does the Sun's corona heat up to a temperature that is much higher than the photosphere. Although there are some ideas how this happens, the details aren't quite clear yet.
How do astronomers know the black hole exist?
Astronomers know because they have studied star patterns and placements and know when there has been a change between where there is a black hole and where there isn't one.
What are the prove Divine sources except God?
No 'divine' sources or divinities have been proven to exist.
Proof god doesnt exist?
It is not possible to prove God doesn't exist, just as we can't prove fairies, elves and unicorns don't exist. The inability to prove something doesn't exist does not therefore mean that it does exist. It is not possible to prove that there is no teapot in orbit around Pluto, yet the lack of such a proof doesn't mean that the teapot therefore exists. There have been several attempts to prove that God exists using logic (eg Kalam cosmological argument, Transcendental Argument for God [TAG]), but these are not universally accepted as valid and true - if they were then there'd be no need for any further discussion.
Why are ghosts not seen by people?
Well, the fact that no one has been able to prove that ghosts exist would be a favourite explanation.
Are astronauts and astronomers the same?
As astronaut travels into outer space and some have been killed doing so. Most astronomers stay on the planet Earth and look up into space. There have been astronauts who are astronomers, but, most astronomers are not astronauts. There have been tens of millions of astronomers looking up at outer space, but, only a few hundred astronauts. No, they are not the same.
Can you prove that there is no god?
One viewOn the contrary I can prove he is there, you find him around to motivate you to excel in everything and stand for whatever is right. Another viewGenerally, it is not possible to prove a negative, so no one can absolutely prove that God does not exist, just as no one can prove that Zeua or Brahma does not exist. However, in each case it is possible to prove that it is most unlikely that they exist. The Pascal's Wager should really be to worship all gods, in case one or the other turns out to exist after all.It is a fallacy, in any case, that atheists must prove that God does not exist. Normal practice is that the person who asserts something to exist must do the proving; so Christians must prove that God does exist, but after centuries of trying are still unable to do so. A famous parallel example is that if I assert that orbiting the sun between earth and Mars there is a small, perfectly formed teapot, I must prove its existence: it is not for sceptics to prove its nonexistence.Another viewIt is possible to rule out the existence of gods that have certain attributes beyond a reasonable doubt. The traditional view of God as an omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent being can be safely ruled out, as the attributes named are mutually incompatible. If God possesses omniscience, and knows perfectly and entirely all future events, then He is not free to change what has been foreseen and is therefore not omnipotent. If He can change what he has foreseen then there is a flaw in his omniscience. His supposed attribute of omnibenevolence is incompatible with natural and human evil in the world. As for proving a negative see link below.
Are the canals on Mars irrigration ditches?
Sadly, the canals on Mars do not exist. although several astronomers reported seeing them, the canals are now believed to have been a combination of optical illusion and self-delusion.
Why have astronomers only been on the moon?
Only astronauts have been to the moon.
