o
Only in the angle of incidence.
Objects fall faster to the earth, then compared to the moon, it is due to the different power of gravity on the the earth and moon.
have different sets of spectral lines. :) u got to love astronomy
Compared to what ? -- Compared to the surface of Mars, it's 43.7% as much. -- Compared to the surface of Pluto, it's 2.8 times as much. -- Compared to the surface of the Earth, it's 16.5% as much.
The mass on Venus compared to Earth is 80%.
Actually in mass spectrometer the isotopes of an element are separated by applying magnetic field.Each isotope is then compared with carbon-12 to get the atomic mass of that isotope.
Light is filtered to remove all but one specific wavelength, this wavelength is then passed through the sample. A sensor on the other side of the sample measures the intensity of the light that was not absorbed which is compared to the initial intensity of the light. This is an indirect approach to measuring the absorbance of the sample.
Atomic absorption spectrometry is more sensitive than atomic emission spectrometry.
probably not. starlight takes more than a million years sometimes to reach us, and considering the amazing speed of light that means that those stars are extremely far away. Many stars will die off and many new ones will be born. Also the constellations appear different if pictures of them are compared every hundred or so years. Hope i helped.
The absorption of amino acids, simple sugars (such as glucose), vitamins and minerals involves active transport processes. in contrast, the products of fat (fatty acids) digestion are lipid-soluble molecules and are able to diffuse easily through the membranes of the intestinal cells.
"Compared to" is used to highlight similarities between two different things. "Compared with" is used to examine the differences between two similar things.
Carotenoid absorption efficiency from salads is higher when regular dressing is used compared with low-fat dressing.
information about what is different about plate movement in califora as compared with pakistan.
Absorption costing is the act of taking on a small added expense, say adding a slice of pie to a person's food order for free. The feature of this that could cause a drop in net income in one period as compared to another is the fact that, for example, as restaurant may have given extra food for free more in one month than compared to another.
hope u all can help me about this question
It has the same look compared to it, but a different grille
Both are correct in different circumstance. We use compared to when the subjects are of different orders, for example Compared to a brick, this car is aerodynamic. We use compared with when the subjects are of the same order, for example Compared with Robert Frost, Rod McKuen isn't much of a poet.Alternative Answer'Compared with' is used for generalisations, such as "Compared with the Victorians, we are a much healthier society".'Compared to' is used to compare statistical facts, such as "A four-by-four uses more fuel compared to a mini".