0
What else can I help you with?
How is this panspermia hypothesis proved?
The panspermia hypothesis suggests that life may have originated from another planet and spread to Earth through comets or meteorites. While there is evidence to support the idea that microbial life can survive in space, there is currently no direct proof of panspermia. Scientists continue to study the origins of life on Earth and explore the possibility of life existing elsewhere in the universe to further test this hypothesis.
This hypothesis is supported by evidence from the record?
The hypothesis is supported by evidence from the record, indicating a strong correlation between the variables being studied. The data collected aligns with the predictions made by the hypothesis, providing empirical support for its validity. Further analysis and testing may be necessary to confirm the hypothesis and establish its significance.
How does red shift from distant galaxies provide evidence for the beginning of the universe?
Redshift from distant galaxies indicates that these galaxies are moving away from us, which suggests that the universe is expanding. This phenomenon is a key piece of evidence supporting the Big Bang theory, as it implies that the universe was once concentrated in a much smaller, hotter state. By measuring the degree of redshift, astronomers can estimate the rate of expansion and extrapolate back to a singular starting point, reinforcing the idea of a beginning to the universe. Thus, redshift provides crucial observational support for the concept of an expanding universe that originated from an initial explosive event.
What did the discovery of background radiation distributed evenly throughout the universe provide support for?
The discovery of background radiation, known as the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), provided strong evidence for the Big Bang theory of the universe's origin. Its presence and uniform distribution across the universe offer a snapshot of the early universe, supporting the idea of a hot, dense beginning followed by expanding and cooling over time.
Is the statement Life exists on planets in other galaxies a scientific hypothesis?
No, it is a statement, but there is a hypothesis that there is life in other galaxies, or even outside the solar system but in our own galaxy, but it can't really be described as scientific because no evidence has ever been found.
What evidence did Wegeners have to support his theory?
Fossils support his hypothesis.
What is a statement that does not have experimental evidence to support it?
Hypothesis.
How do you support a hypothesis?
You obtain objective evidence to support it by undertaking experiments designed to test the veracity of the hypothesis.
Which type of evidence was not used by Alfred wegener to support his continental hypothesis?
Which type of evidence was NOT used by Alfred Wegener to support his continental drift hypothesis human remains
When the evidence in a scientific experiment does not support the hypothesis what should the scientist do?
When the evidence in a scientific experiment does not support the hypothesis the scientist:Confirm through repeated experimentation that the evidence is validReject the hypothesisDevelop another hypothesis that is consistent with the valid evidence
Did the addition of molecular evidence support or refute the hypothesis that you made earlier based on structural evidence only?
The addition of molecular evidence supported the hypothesis made earlier based on structural evidence. Molecular evidence provides additional data that can confirm or strengthen hypotheses that are based on structural evidence.
How is it easy to support a hypothesis?
Well...it all depends on the hypothesis. For example, if you know exactly how to back it up with evidence, than very easy. But...if your hypothesis is kind of 'far out', and finding evidence will be difficult, then writing it will be hard.
Explain in detail the three possible outcomes that may result from this research?
The question is very poorly specified so this answer is simply a wild guess at what the questioner might want. Three possible outcomes of any research, designed to test some hypothesis, are: (a) evidence in support of the hypothesis; (b) evidence disproving the hypothesis; or (c) evidence that can neither prove (support) nor disprove the hypothesis.
The results you expect when you test hypothesis?
You are supposed to assume/expect that nothing happens, or the norm happens. E.g. if you are testing if plants grow more in light, you assume they dont, then see if that expectation is consistent with the result.
What happens if our data does not support our hypothesis?
If your data does not support your hypothesis, it means that there is not enough evidence to conclude that your hypothesis is true. In such cases, you may need to reconsider your hypothesis, collect additional data, or revise your experimental approach. It is important to acknowledge and learn from results that do not support your initial hypothesis in order to refine your research and understanding.
What does it mean to support or refute a hypothesis?
To support a hypothesis means you agree, and may even give supporting evidence.To refute it means you submit evidence that a hypothesis is incorrect , or you make a cogent and persuasive argument against it.
Which was not included in the support for harry hess's hypothesis sea floor spreading?
Granitic strips in the ocean floor ... Novanet
