these are the multiple choice options:
these are the multiple choice options:a. Jovian planets can migrate inward from the orbits in which they are born.b. In some star systems, it is possible for jovian planets to form in the inner solar system and terrestrial planets to form in the outer solar system.c. Some of the "exceptions to the rules" in our own solar system are likely to have been the result of giant impacts.d. In addition to the categories of terrestrial and jovian, there must be an "in-between" category of planet that has the mass of a jovian planet but the composition of a terrestrial planet.
The terrestrial planets are less massive and therefore have less gravity. As a result, much of the lighter gases could escape, in the process of planet formation.
In simple terms - gravity caused the Sun to form. This pulled gas and 'debris' from the 'big bang' into orbit around it - and the result was the formation of the planets.
The Big Bang did not directly create Earth or any other planets. The Big Bang theory describes the initial expansion of the universe and the formation of fundamental elements. Planets formed later through processes like gravitational attraction and accretion of matter in solar systems. Each planet's formation is a result of its unique conditions and history.
Not all the planets orbit the sun - other stars have planets too. But all the planets in our solar system, which is the system of our sun, revolve around the sun; otherwise they would be in other solar systems. All the planets we can see with our naked eye orbit the sun, since the planets orbiting the sun are the only ones close enough to earth to see without a telescope.
these are the multiple choice options:a. Jovian planets can migrate inward from the orbits in which they are born.b. In some star systems, it is possible for jovian planets to form in the inner solar system and terrestrial planets to form in the outer solar system.c. Some of the "exceptions to the rules" in our own solar system are likely to have been the result of giant impacts.d. In addition to the categories of terrestrial and jovian, there must be an "in-between" category of planet that has the mass of a jovian planet but the composition of a terrestrial planet.
If two planets were to collide, it would result in a catastrophic event leading to the destruction of both planets. The force and impact from the collision would cause massive damage and likely result in the formation of new celestial bodies.
Most of these are a result of giant impacts
The terrestrial planets are less massive and therefore have less gravity. As a result, much of the lighter gases could escape, in the process of planet formation.
In simple terms - gravity caused the Sun to form. This pulled gas and 'debris' from the 'big bang' into orbit around it - and the result was the formation of the planets.
Planets cannot physically touch because they are separated by the vacuum of space. If by "touch" you mean collide, it would result in a catastrophic event, causing massive destruction and potentially leading to the formation of a new celestial body or disrupting the orbits of other nearby planets.
It seems odd to postulate that the planets/moons in our galaxy were the result of collisions. If that were true, why have we not been witnessing recurring collisions-- with the creation of other new planets/moons?
The Big Bang did not directly create Earth or any other planets. The Big Bang theory describes the initial expansion of the universe and the formation of fundamental elements. Planets formed later through processes like gravitational attraction and accretion of matter in solar systems. Each planet's formation is a result of its unique conditions and history.
Mutations result in formation of genetically different cells.
No. Planets have gravity as a result of their own mass.
Wind shear can result in the formation of a tornado.
birth control.