impact theory
Kepler's findings, particularly his laws of planetary motion, provided strong mathematical support for Copernicus's heliocentric model, demonstrating that planets move in elliptical orbits rather than perfect circles. This contradicted Ptolemy's geocentric model, which relied on complex circular orbits and epicycles to explain planetary movements. By showing that the sun, not the Earth, is at the center of planetary orbits, Kepler's work helped to validate Copernicus's theories and laid the groundwork for modern astronomy, ultimately displacing the Ptolemaic system.
There is no definitive evidence to suggest that NASA is hiding information about the Moon or Mars. The agency regularly shares data and findings from its missions, including images, research, and discoveries. However, some conspiracy theories persist, often fueled by a misunderstanding of scientific processes and the complexities involved in space exploration. It's important to critically evaluate claims and rely on credible scientific sources for accurate information.
Albert Einstein's theories are widely accepted because they have been extensively tested through experiments and observations, and have consistently provided accurate predictions about the natural world. The principles and concepts of his theories have been validated by the scientific community and have stood the test of time, earning them a high level of credibility and acceptance.
There is no credible evidence to suggest that NASA is hiding significant secrets from the public. NASA operates with a commitment to transparency, sharing a vast amount of data and research findings with the public and the scientific community. While some information may be classified for national security reasons or related to ongoing missions, most of NASA's work is openly accessible. Conspiracy theories about secrecy often arise from misunderstandings or speculation rather than factual basis.
Observations that describe have various names based on the context, such as facts, data, evidence, or findings. They provide information, details, or characteristics about a particular subject or situation.
You have it backwards. Theories are supported by evidence. Evidence is not supported by theories, evidence is simply observed.
The term for a complex explanation of phenomena based on findings from scientific research is a theory. Scientific theories are well-supported explanations that encompass a wide range of observations, experiments, and data.
records and witnesses
People should consider theories supported by scientific evidence and research, such as the idea that the Nazca lines served a ceremonial or ritual purpose for the Nazca culture. However, it's important to remain open to new findings and interpretations as our understanding of the lines evolves.
Scientific theories.
Scientists have updated their theories about Venus because of new data collected from recent spacecraft missions. These new findings have revealed a better understanding of Venus's atmosphere, surface, and geological features, prompting a revision of previous assumptions.
they supported them
Yes, in the field of science, the overall consensus is that claims and theories should be backed by empirical evidence and logical reasoning. When scientists present arguments supported by data and experimentation, it enhances the credibility and validity of their findings in the scientific community.
laissez-faire
punching babies is right!
theories :)
theories :)