Who are the scientist who are against big bang theory?

Answer 1

Real ones, Real Scientist believe in Scientifically acurrate Theorys & do not hold on to anything disproven by the laws of Phisics.

The Big Bang is;

One of the Laws of Physics;Conservation of Angular Momentum

e.g.If an object is spinning clockwise and bits fly off it they will also spin Clockwise as they fly off.

Try it at home!; get some Friends on a merry go round get some Strong guy to spin your freinds round clockwise and when they fly off,they will fly off spinning clockwise never anti clockwise.try it.

Anyway according to the big bang theory all the matter and planets came from the big bang.all the matter and planets should be spinning the same way off it-true?

Actually, NOT TRUE.

Like many people inspired by popular presentations of the BB, you seem to imagine it as an explosion of dense matter into empty space. This is not correct, the BB was an expansion of space itself, taking matter along with it. As that matter formed atoms and then coalesced, SOME of that matter would have "clockwise" angular momentum and some would have the opposite. It would all be completely random on which had some type and which had a different type.

How come Venus spins backward?

How come some moons spin backward than their planets?

Collisions between proto-planets can radically alter the initial angular momentum of these planets. Since our Moon is (most likely) the result of such a collision, it is no surprise its momentum may not seem "correct."

How come whole galaxys spin backwards???????

To the same extent that some air molecules will be traveling in the direction opposite to the main drift velocity of a fluid, some small, random parts of a galaxy can have initial angular momentum different from that of the galaxy as a whole. Since the initial clumping of matter that eventually resulted in our Sun came from the blast remants of a supernova, it is no surprise that the initial angular momentum would have a random value that may be different from what it "ought" to be.

If it all came of the big bang then why isn't it all spining in the same direction?

If it was true all the Galaxys would be spinning in the same direction.

The preceding two statements are utterly false.

<< >>

"if they all came from the big bang they would be spinning in the same direction - but that is utterly false" - that's ok then. Taking the sentence in quotes, which part is false, the first part or the second?

The above might be a defence of the big bang using some ideas from classics physics, or it might be completely the opposite (or it might be a trick question from Philosophy 101).

But neither the Big Bang's adherents nor their opponents confine their ideas to only one principle (conservation of angular momentum here). Here on board the good ship 'Earth' the atmosphere can spin either way and that causes our big changes of weather. The BBT fully allows objects to rotate in any plane, but it is true that in most galaxies most stars rotate the same way (when looked at from the direction that we call 'north').

Answer 2

While some scientists have questioned aspects of the Big Bang theory, the overwhelming majority of the scientific community supports it. Some critics suggest alternative theories like plasma cosmology or steady state theory, but these ideas have not gained widespread acceptance due to lack of supporting evidence. It's important to note that scientific theories evolve as new evidence emerges, but the Big Bang theory remains the most widely accepted explanation for the origin of the universe.