Yes, a balance on the Moon would still read masses correctly, as balances measure mass, not weight. While the gravitational pull on the Moon is about one-sixth that of Earth, causing objects to weigh less, the balance would still accurately reflect the mass of the objects placed on it. The principle behind the balance relies on the comparison of inertial mass, which remains constant regardless of the gravitational field strength. Thus, the readings would be consistent with the mass of the objects.
Yes, a balance on the Moon, which has one-sixth the gravity of Earth, would still read masses correctly because it measures mass rather than weight. Mass remains constant regardless of the gravitational field strength, so objects will have the same mass on the Moon as they do on Earth. However, the weight displayed would be significantly less due to the lower gravitational pull.
A spring scale would not. But a balance scale, which compares two masses, would compare them accurately in any place with significant gravity, no matter the size of the local gravity.
The details are a bit complicated, and scientists are still trying to find part of the answer. But what you need to know, for most practical purposes, is that the gravitational force is related to masses. Masses attract one another. (According to the General Theory of Relativity, masses will distort space; this space distortion causes the attractive force on other masses. Scientists also believe that the force of gravity is transmitted through a hypothetical particle called a "graviton"; so far, they didn't manage to detect one, and it is expected to be very difficult to detect.)
If they were both the size of the Sun then the Earth would not form (It would be a star).Imagining fr a second that Earth did form the bodies would rotate around a common centre of gravity. And we would all be squashed flat by the Super-Earth's gravity (not that we would be there in this totally hypothetical senario).If they were both the size of the Earth then the Sun would not be nearly large enough to achieve fusion in it's core. So would not be a star.
Yes, people on the space station in a geosynchronous orbit above Earth would still experience microgravity, which can make them feel weightless. This is because they are continuously falling towards Earth due to the balance between their forward motion and the planet's gravitational pull.
Yes, a balance on the Moon, which has one-sixth the gravity of Earth, would still read masses correctly because it measures mass rather than weight. Mass remains constant regardless of the gravitational field strength, so objects will have the same mass on the Moon as they do on Earth. However, the weight displayed would be significantly less due to the lower gravitational pull.
A spring scale would not. But a balance scale, which compares two masses, would compare them accurately in any place with significant gravity, no matter the size of the local gravity.
You have spelled 'still' correctly.
No. The balance is an unsecured debt and is discharged. Sometimes people do not do the paperwork correctly, which can cause problems.
If the patient was trustworthy and I knew the patient would pay the back balance.
You Trinessa would not work correctly if you started on Monday without your period.
Yes you can, however you still must pay back the balance of what you still owe.Yes you can, however you still must pay back the balance of what you still owe.Yes you can, however you still must pay back the balance of what you still owe.Yes you can, however you still must pay back the balance of what you still owe.Yes you can, however you still must pay back the balance of what you still owe.Yes you can, however you still must pay back the balance of what you still owe.
-no mountains -Pangaea may still exist -no individual cultures -no earthquakes -no volcano's -no life
The gravitational field depends on masses, and the distances to the masses. The gravitational field will be stronger close to large masses, such as the Sun and planets; but there is nowhere in space where you would be entirely free from a gravitational field. For example, if you go a thousand light-years away, the gravitational attraction of the entire Solar System would be insignificant, but you would still have the gravitational field of the Milky Way.
As it is still unearned which means we have not yet provide the benefit of which we have received the rent that's why it's the liability of company and it would be shown at liability side of balance sheet.
Firstly, I corrected your english. If you spoke correctly, you would write correctly. I changed "your still cute" to "you're" . One has an or sound; the other has a ur sound.In hawai`ian, this is Na'e au u'i 'oe [na A ow oo ee O-A]
because if you lose balance and fall off y would be still suck to the bike so that why there no seatbelt