In a population of organisms all are variations and all are in the same immediate environment. Let's assume that this environment is a desert. Now, members of the population that are able to conserve scarce resources, such as water, better than other members of this population will have higher survivability and reproductive success than the other organisms of the population. This process will confer this trait on their descendents who will be of greater representation in the population leading to the evolution, the change in allele frequency over time, in this population.
Remember, it is not enough to survive, but one must couple that with reproductive success.
Survival is essential for better adaptation and continuity of once began biological world....
Some organism's are more adapted to their environment so predator's don't see them, so then they survive and they keep on passing their gene's on to the next generation for year's to come.
The standard definitions is "(of a disease or disease-causing organism) likely to be transmitted to people, organisms, etc., through the environment."It has come to mean " likely to spread or influence others in a rapid manner."
Living organisms depend on each other to survive. For instance, animals feed on vegetation (otherwise known as herbivores) to survive. Others on meat (carnivores) or both (Omnivores). This is called a symbiotic relationship. The relationship can be mutualistic, commensal, or parasitic. Organisms in symbiosis are called symbiont.
The Darwin's theory of natural selection emphasizes that the organisms of the same species with more beneficial traits survive while the others die off.
Photoautotrophs are organisms that perform photosynthesis. Less commonly they can be called holophytes.Examples of non-plant photoautotrophs include:algaecyanobacteria
Some organism's are more adapted to their environment so predator's don't see them, so then they survive and they keep on passing their gene's on to the next generation for year's to come.
All living organisms need water to survive, because they have cells. With air, not all living organisms need air. Some forms of bacteria do not need oxygen to live, and others can't stand oxygen.
yes all animals adopt to some degree to survive and thrive in their environment. Although some organisms may have to change more than others
Those organisms have a wider food variety; for example a bird that eats only flies will not survive as well as a bird that eats flies and beetles, if the flies run out.
I believe what you're referring to is natural selection. In short, yes it does. Certain organisms have characteristics that allow them to survive more efficiently in a certain environment than other organisms of the same species. As a result, these organisms survive to reproduce, thus passing on these efficient variations to their offspring, and so the cycle continues. The organism without these variations is less likely to survive, meaning it will be unable to reproduce and pass on it's characteristics. Eventually, this will cycle out the characteristics or variations that aren't adequate for surviving in said environment, and only the well-equipped will survive. This process is more commonly known as "survival of the fittest."
Some seeds are more likely to survive than others so there are less, and the ones that are less likely to survive produce more, there are a few other variables but that's the basic reason for it.
They can survive in areas of the earth where no other life forms can be found. For example, some of them can't survive in oxygen, and others are found deep inside the ocean vents.
Living beings need a certain amount of resources to live. If resources are limited then organisms must struggle against others to get enough resources to keep living.
People with psoriatic arthritis are more likely than others to have close relatives with the disease, but they are just as likely to have relatives with psoriasis but no joint disease.
It is likely that stenohaline freshwater fish would die. Others with better osmoregulatory abilities might be able to survive.
If the world had no fungus it would most likely affect the entire worlds ecosystems. This would mean that lesser organism and higher organisms wouldn't be able to survive due to lack of nourishment provided by the fungus. All i am trying to say is that it would cause certain organisms to go extinct and that in effect causes others to do the same. It's anyone's guess as to who the change would effect primarily.
The standard definitions is "(of a disease or disease-causing organism) likely to be transmitted to people, organisms, etc., through the environment."It has come to mean " likely to spread or influence others in a rapid manner."