The nuclear membrane and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) of modern eukaryotes are continuous.
Apex: conclusion
This statement is correct because a hypothesis is a proposed explanation that has not been validated through experimentation and evidence. Scientific inquiry aims to test and gather evidence to support or reject a hypothesis, rather than proving it true. It is always possible for new evidence or data to emerge that could challenge or refine a hypothesis.
You are supposed to assume/expect that nothing happens, or the norm happens. E.g. if you are testing if plants grow more in light, you assume they dont, then see if that expectation is consistent with the result.
The hypothesis is supported by data from previous research studies, observational data, and controlled experiments. This data may include statistical analyses, graphs, tables, findings from literature reviews, and expert opinions. Additionally, the hypothesis may be supported by correlations, significant p-values, and reproducible results from multiple studies.
H1 hypothesis is rejected when the p-value associated with the test statistic is less than the significance level (usually 0.05) chosen for the hypothesis test. This indicates that the data provides enough evidence to reject the alternative hypothesis in favor of the null hypothesis.
Evidence tests a hypothesis by providing data that either supports or refutes it. This process involves collecting observations or experimental results that are relevant to the hypothesis. If the evidence consistently aligns with the predictions made by the hypothesis, it strengthens its validity; if the evidence contradicts the hypothesis, it may lead to its rejection or revision. Ultimately, rigorous testing and evaluation of evidence are essential for establishing scientific credibility.
The presence of certain genetic and molecular features, such as introns, histones, and similarities in the RNA polymerase structure, suggest a closer evolutionary relationship between archaea and eukaryotes. Additionally, comparative genomics studies have shown that archaea share more genes and metabolic pathways with eukaryotes than with bacteria. This evidence supports the hypothesis that archaea and eukaryotes share a common ancestry.
The evidence that made you come to that conclusion. Remember that a hypothesis is an educated guess
Yes, hypotheses should be supported by evidence to be considered valid. Evidence helps to confirm or refute the hypothesis, guiding further research and understanding of the subject. In scientific inquiry, robust evidence strengthens the credibility of the hypothesis and contributes to the development of knowledge. Ultimately, without evidence, a hypothesis remains speculative and unsubstantiated.
when there s proof to back it up with evidence or an experiment to test the hypothesis
hypothesis
Apex: conclusion
When the evidence in a scientific experiment does not support the hypothesis the scientist:Confirm through repeated experimentation that the evidence is validReject the hypothesisDevelop another hypothesis that is consistent with the valid evidence
Hypothesis.
A well-supported hypothesis is a theory that appears to have a lot of evidence behind it. This evidence helps to make it seem likely that the hypothesis is true, but it is still just a theory until it has been proven.
The Evidence - 2006 And the Envelope Please 1-8 is rated/received certificates of: Netherlands:12 USA:TV-14
This statement is correct because a hypothesis is a proposed explanation that has not been validated through experimentation and evidence. Scientific inquiry aims to test and gather evidence to support or reject a hypothesis, rather than proving it true. It is always possible for new evidence or data to emerge that could challenge or refine a hypothesis.