If the entire field of view is 32 mm and the object occupies 25% of that then you will multiply 32 by 0.25. The result is 8 mm.
With one hand, the average male human cannot hold and grasp a basketball from the top without it falling. The standard basketball is a little over 9 inches in diameter. Given that women will have smaller hands on average, the diameter that the average human can hold and prevent from falling, and this is complete conjecture, should be between 5-7 inches. But first, the average human hand size would have to be determined. With two hands, the largest diameter object the average human could hold would be significantly larger, dependent on the wingspan of the average human, the surface texture and the weight of the object, and the average height and strength of the average human .
Yes, the magnification based on the length would coincide with the magnification based on the width. However, the object on the slide is only measured by its diameter.
Higher power "zooms" in quite a lot. Specifdicly, it "zooms" to the very center of the field of view. This means that something just barely in the field of view (on the side, for example), would no longer be visible as when you zoom in your field of view gets smaller. I know that sounds a bit confusing... sorry! :/
Bourne believed that an object would float or sink at will as long as he could manipulate the effect's of buoyancy which control and object to sink or float.
the space an organism occupies is called a niche the surroundings of and organism would be its habitat I hope this is what you meant by organisms surroundings? if not restate question a little more clearly
No, weight is the amount of force an object exerts on another. For example you push down on the Earth with a weight of approximately 600 Newtons whilst on the moon you would weigh less and in empty space you would weigh nothing. Mass is the amount of matter an object occupies and does not vary with your location.
Volume is the space that an object occupies (or that it would occupy if it were to exist in the physical world rather than just as a concept).
Newtonian gravitational field and an electric field. If it were moving then it would feel a magnetic field.
the naswe is 400
The diameter is the measurement of a line that goes right through a circle, through the centre point. In cases where we have a ring or some other such object with multiple circles, we would have an external diameter and an internal diameter. The internal diameter is the diameter of the inner circle. The external diameter is the diameter of the outer circle.
Volume can be intrinsic or extrinsic, depending on the context. Intrinsic volume refers to the amount of space occupied by an object or substance itself, while extrinsic volume includes the space occupied by the object or substance together with any surrounding or enclosing space. For example, the intrinsic volume of a solid object would be the amount of space it occupies, while the extrinsic volume would include the space it occupies along with any air or other material surrounding it.
None. I am sure tat if you measured it to a very high degree of accuracy it would not be exactly 120 km. Furthermore, there is not an object that is perfectly spherical so the diameter will vary from point to point.
Since the field of view is a circle, the size of the field of view is it's area. You would need to find the diameter of the field of view, using a transparent ruler or a micrometer. Divide the diameter measurement by 2 to get the radius. Then use the formula for the area of a circle, Area = πr2. For example, you measure the diameter of the field of view to be 2.14mm. Divide 2.14mm by 2 to get the radius, and you get 1.07mm. Square 1.07mm, which is 1.14mm2. Multiply x 3.14 (pi), and you get 3.58mm2. So the field of view for this example would be 3.58mm2.The field of view differs with different magnifications. The lower the magnification, the larger the field of view.
Were such a figure to be inscribed upon a plane such that the longest diameter of the object was equal to the extent of the visible universe, the sides would be far smaller than the diameter of a proton. Such an object would be, for all practical purposes, a circle, and any smaller copy would approach a circle even more closely.
There is no maximum diameter, it just depends on how much you stretch it or insert an object to stretch it. I would say most people cannot take more than 3 inch diameter as that is a lot of stretch.
I don't believe there is a way to find the mass of an object knowing only the diameter of the object. If you had the volume, or some other measurements sure. the best bet would be just to weigh it, or find the volume using the principles of displacement.
That would be "matter".