Schliden, Schwann, and Virchow.
Theodor Schwann
new cells are produced from existing cells.
The more scientists worked on finding out more about the cell the more they learned about cells. Plus the microscopes became more advanced then the more they could see what was in the cell. (This is only a middle school answer!!!)
well you see with technology in the advanced version scientist can do more research up close to see extra cells. but the minimal amount of technology could not help scientist hope this helps :)
The theory of use and disuse of Jean-Baptiste Lamarck, advocated the idea that animals acquired characteristics after using certain physical traits constantly. For example, he believed that the reason why the necks of giraffes were long was because they stretched to reach leaves on high trees. By the same logic, the lack of a human tail could be explained by the fact that humans did not use it. This idea is not correct, however, it advanced evolutionary theory!
Cellular biologist. Lived 1821 to 1902. Born in what is now Poland, and there is an academic award named for him, He discovermitosis it was very importantAll cells could form only from other cellsVirchow discovered that cells came from preexisting cells, proving the theory of spontaneous generation incorrect.true in 1547 virchow was investigating with a new microscope when he saw a "goop" like liquid inside the cell.
The Theory, is what you think is gonna happen, for example, In Theory, a aeroplane could be given jet engines that run on High Octane Petrol( i don't know if that's true, its just a theory!) but we could try that and it could just crash, then our conclusion would be 'aeroplanes can not fly using High Octane Petrol, Aviation Fuel must be used' A Theory is an idea (Should be an educated idea, with reasoning behind it) and a conclusion is what your result is when you test that theory. Hope I helped.
new cells are produced from existing cells.
lalala
the cell theory and the microscope
God is an almighty form of a savior who created this earth and all that is in it- You could know this by the first chapter in the bible Genesis And most people who would make this conclusion are 99.9% correct. Maybe it was the Big Bang theory or God.
In theory it could. A virus goes into a cell an replaces its DNA to make that cell produce more virus. So in theory we could make a viral infection that would go into the cells and change the DNA, it would be very completed though.
conclusion of directive principles of state policy
They all involve things that cannot be seen with the eye alone.
No its not a conclusion for a debate but you could ask politics about it.
No its not a conclusion for a debate but you could ask politics about it.
He could not draw a conclusion on the basis of conversation. This is an example using the phrase draw a conclusion.
Any theory could be right.