The answer depends on a willingness to take a risk. Whether you settle for something certain, or gamble on getting more, will often depend on what you have, what you need, and what you want.
The answer would be
YES. A bird in the hand is definitely worth two in the bush, if you need a bird.
NO. If getting two means you don't have to get one tomorrow. In this simple example: if you found you could get two, and in more than half of your tries, then in the long run, getting two sometimes, and none other times, would be better than always getting just one.
---
Yes, be happy with what you have. Sometimes going after what seems to be a better deal will leave you with nothing but a hand full of bird poop.
"A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush."
A bird in hand is worth two in the bush.
A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
no, its worth two in the bush
The expression, "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.", means that work or be satisfied with what (the bird) you have, you can waste your time chasing the "two in the bush" and may never get them.
it is nothing
"A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" is a sentence.
The sentence of the proverb " A BIRD IN THE HAND IS WORTH TWO IN THE BUSH" is You better participate in the Quiz rather than the painting competition because if you win in the quiz competition you are going to get a full scholarship rather than a medal in the painting competition. You know " A BIRD IN THE HAND IS WORTH TWO IN THE BUSH" .
A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush
It means it's a win-win situation. A bird in the hand's worth two in the bush, but two in the hand is better still
It means that have one thing for sure, for certain, is better than a maybe. A "bird in the hand" mans a bird that you have already caught, as opposed to two sitting in the bush that you MAY catch- or may not. And the actual expression is "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush."