If a catalyst were added to a reaction diagram, it would typically be shown as a separate step or pathway with lower activation energy compared to the uncatalyzed reaction. The overall energy profile of the reaction would be shifted downward, indicating that the catalyst lowers the activation energy required for the reaction to proceed, leading to an increased reaction rate.
The overall enthalpy change in a common reaction would not change. Only the path to get there would change. A catalyst basically lessens the activation energy required to get the reaction to take place.
Adding a catalyst to the mixture would not affect the equilibrium concentration of H2O. A catalyst speeds up the rate of the forward and reverse reactions equally, without changing the position of the equilibrium. This means that the equilibrium concentration of H2O would not be affected by the presence of a catalyst.
If platinum were added to hydrogen peroxide solution, you would likely observe bubbles of oxygen gas being produced. Platinum can act as a catalyst to help decompose hydrogen peroxide into water and oxygen.
The chemical formula for a hydrogen catalyst would depend on the specific catalyst being used. Common hydrogen catalysts include platinum (Pt), palladium (Pd), and nickel (Ni).
I honestly think it would because a catalyst lowers the activation energy, the amount of energy needed to complete the reaction. Since the activation energy is lower, it is absorbing less energy. I guess if its becoming less endothermic, its becoming more exothermic. Hope this helped!
If a catalyst were added to the reaction apex, the graph would show a decrease in the activation energy barrier, allowing the reaction to proceed more quickly. However, the overall shape of the graph would remain the same, as a catalyst does not change the reactants or products, only the rate at which equilibrium is reached. Consequently, the transition state would occur lower on the energy axis, but the starting and final energy levels would stay constant.
It depends on what the catalyst would be.
The overall enthalpy change in a common reaction would not change. Only the path to get there would change. A catalyst basically lessens the activation energy required to get the reaction to take place.
Cloning would be added as a distinct circle outside the existing categories in the Venn diagram to represent a separate concept or technology. This circle would not overlap with any of the existing categories to show that cloning is a unique entity on its own.
Adding a catalyst to the mixture would not affect the equilibrium concentration of H2O. A catalyst speeds up the rate of the forward and reverse reactions equally, without changing the position of the equilibrium. This means that the equilibrium concentration of H2O would not be affected by the presence of a catalyst.
catalyst but i would strongly recomend the Triton
Temperature
If platinum were added to hydrogen peroxide solution, you would likely observe bubbles of oxygen gas being produced. Platinum can act as a catalyst to help decompose hydrogen peroxide into water and oxygen.
I would like to have a diagram of synapsis?
a catalyst increases the rate of the reaction by providing an alternative pathway with lower activation energy. The catalyst itself is not consumed in the reaction, allowing it to be reused multiple times. This results in faster reaction rates and potentially higher yields of products.
The opposite of a catalyst is an inhibitor, something that suppresses or slows a reaction.
I think it would be pretty safe to say he invented the Venn Diagram