no. density is not determined by mass alone (grams) but by mass and volume together (mass divided by volume). when you add mass you also add a proportionate amount of volume because every molecule of that compound is identical. (we infer this because both substance A and B are labeled the same so assuming it was labeled correctly they are the the same substance.) this means that the density does not ever change, whether you are finding the density of carbon tetrachloride or a slab of granite density never changes because of mass. there are ways to change the ratio of mass to volume, there by changing density while leaving the substance chemically unaltered but that is not what we are discussing at the moment. for your purposes, no, a 500g sample of carbon tetrachloride will not have a greater density than a 7.0g sample. (also, try to keep your decimal points straight, if it is 7.0 then it is 500.0 unless you are rounding to the 500 buy then it should be 7 not 7.0. and one final thing, when deciding how many decimal places to go to when taking mass measure to the smallest measurement you can and then go one more place over ( as in if your balance measures up to the hundredth, .00, estimate what is in between the two lines to the thousandth, .000, unless it is a digital read out then obviously you can't round))
London/Van der Waal's/Dispersion forces. Carbon tetrachloride has no dipole, no hydrogen bonding, and is not ionic.
The answer is 6,2729.10e+26 carbon atoms.
Yes they wouldn't have the same composition but not properties!
Carbon-13 make up 1.1% of carbon atoms. .011 x 19000 carbon atoms = 209 carbon-13 atoms present.
No, steel is a combination of Carbon and Iron. When referring to steel as "carbon steel" usually means the particular sample contains more carbon. This makes the steel harder but less flexible making it more liable to fracture.
London/Van der Waal's/Dispersion forces. Carbon tetrachloride has no dipole, no hydrogen bonding, and is not ionic.
Iodine is soluble in carbon tetrachloride.
in every sample of carbon monoxide ,the mass ratio of carbon to oxygen is 3:4
They are identical.
A 63,60 g sample of carbon is equal to 5,296 moles.
No. The only mass numbers of carbon isotopes that occur naturally are 12 and 13, and the number of atoms with mass number 12 is much greater than the number of atoms with mass number 13 in any carbon from natural sources. Carbon-14 exists at all only in carbon including man-made isotopes.
well when the heart pumps then its the sample
Pure germanium is obtained by distllation of germanium tetrachloride, followed by hydrolysis of GeCl4 to GeO2 and reducing of GeO2 with hydrogen to Ge.
The answer is 6,2729.10e+26 carbon atoms.
Yes they wouldn't have the same composition but not properties!
17,200 Years
No, there are no detectable levels of carbon-14 left in any sample older than roughly 40,000 years. Without carbon-14 in the sample, no date can be determined.