You don't say what happened in the accident. Were you 'at fault'? If so, then no I doubt it, if your negligence caused the loss. If another party is At Fault then file with that company as well as your own, (this is about the only scenerio that you aren't going to have a problem). If an unknown party caused a loss say a hit and run while parked and unoccupied and no way to find that party. There are all sorts of problems that result from these losses, your policy will more than likely deny/exclude this as business use, and if you have not rated your vehicle for this they more than likely will deny it. The argument could be make (successfully I think in court, not necessarily with yours or the companys insurance-again assuming you were not negliegent in any fashion) that you were acting as their agent, and wouldn't have suffered this loss had you not been doing something for them in the scope of your employment. If a loss has occured file it with your company, and your employers. I think there is definitely a 'moral' obligation on the part of your employer, but you know how that goes. :( If you drive your vehicle to do company business you need to disclose this to your insurance company and have business use added to your policy (maybe your employer would pay this additional premium?)........if you want to provide me with details, then I could perhaps be of more assistance to you....good luck....also you don't say exactly what you were doing for your employer, if you are just dropping off mail on the way home? Is it a routine part of your employment etc.
It depends on the state the accident occurred in. In California the renter is responsible. Again this varies by the state of the accident.
If you are in your own vehicle during your lunch hour, you do not qualify for work mans comp. The only way work mans comp is responsible for your accident is if it occurred on the job.
Vicarious liability and respondeat superior are legal concepts that hold employers responsible for the actions of their employees. Vicarious liability means the employer is held responsible for the actions of their employees, even if the employer did not directly cause the harm. Respondeat superior is a specific type of vicarious liability that holds the employer responsible for the actions of an employee if the employee was acting within the scope of their employment when the harm occurred.
Many employers have drug policies that include random drug screens or drug screens following an event. Would't you agree that it would be reasonable for an employer to have the right to know if an employee uses drugs which of course is a symptom of extremely poor judgment? Employees who use drugs are far more accident prone. Wouldn't everyone agree that an employer should minimize his risk?
Suddenly an accident occurred.
Mental instability
Yes. The car created a traffic hazard. The person who parked the car is responsible for any accident that occurred as a result.
The worst railroad accident to ever have occurred in the United States of America was the Great Train Wreck of 1918. It is considered to be the worst accident in American history.
If the accident occurred after your policy lapsed and before reinstatement, no, it won't.
Ben Roethlisberger's motorcycle accident occurred on June 12, 2006.
The accident occurred sometime between one and two o'clock yesterday. He was not sure what had occurred while he was gone.
yes - I think it was one-car accident which occurred near her home.