Wikipedia defines thought: Thought generally refers to any mental or intellectual activity involving an individual's subjective consciousness. No computer or computer component available today has subjective consciousness and the ability to make free decisions.
The question whether mankind should seek to design and build a computer able to think will divert people in proponents and opponents. There are ethical questions to consider and there is a primeval fear of competition to consider.
The ethical problem is whether mankind has a right to create intelligent life (in the form of a thinking computer), and subsequently to dominate this form of life in a relationship akin to slavery.
The fear of competition is the fear that we may find ourselves outperformed by the machine which we built (it may be much smarter that we are).
Research over the last several decades show that we are a very long way away from fully understanding even the most primitive natural lifeforms, and have not yet accomplished to successfully emulate the brains of simple animals. Therefore, one could argue that the quest for design and construction of a thinking computer is void in real terms, and that the aforementioned problems are unlikely to arise any time soon. However, it seems likely that continued research in this field will contribute to the general pool of human knowledge, in computer science and all other sciences alike, and should therefore be considered beneficial.
Humans can evolve - Computers cannot Humans can disobey instructions - Computers cannot Humans are organic - Computers aren't There are more, but I won't go on
well, who do you think invented computers?
qualities of humans and computers that contribute to a synergy.
computers
of course they will, how do you think society and humans can survive without computers? they will be a lot different than today, that's for sure. like quantum computers or bio computers.
computers are made by humans for humans
No, because humans invented computers so computers cannot be smarter than humans.
Computers were built for, of course, Humans.
Are computers better data processors than humans
Humans can evolve - Computers cannot Humans can disobey instructions - Computers cannot Humans are organic - Computers aren't There are more, but I won't go on
Bengal tigers will act aggressively towards humans. A person should never attempt to approach a Bengal tiger in the wild.
well, who do you think invented computers?
Humans
We humans have invented many thousands of functions for ourselves. It would not be practical to list them all. Perhaps you should attempt to ask a more specific question.
no
Humans are trying to make computers do everything that they can do. A little will be left after they do so.
No, it knows whatever humans collectively know: such as Wikipedia. Wikipedia is similar to Computers in the sense that Humans program Computers and tell computers certain things to do or to know and such. So, whatever Humans know, a computer could, or does, know.