Answer 1
It doesn't ! - The opposite, - that the SUPPRESSION of hate speech causes violence, - may well be true.
Example:
Article 134 of the Yugoslav criminal code in early 1990s punished with up to ten years imprisonment the person who "incites or fans national, racial or religious hatred or discord between peoples and nationalities".
Answer 2
Hate Speech has the ability to incite individuals to take violent action. Words stir passions and can bring generally peaceful people to the point where they seriously consider harming another person. Almost every Western government has passed laws restricting hate speech in order to protect its citizenry. The enforcement of these laws, contrary to Answer 1's perspective, actual prevents social strife. For example, the Yugoslav provision above was designed to prevent the types of genocide that occurred during the Yugoslav Wars in the 1990s. By silencing individuals who argue that their enemies are subhuman and worthy of death, fewer people are willing to commit heinous crimes.
It is difficult to provide an exact number of racist killings in the US since 1964 as data collection on hate crimes and racially motivated violence has limitations. However, there have been numerous incidents of racially motivated violence and hate crimes in the US over the years. Efforts to track and address these incidents continue to be important for promoting social justice and equality.
Bullying involves repeated aggressive behavior intended to intimidate or harm another person emotionally, socially, or physically. Violence typically refers to actions or behaviors that cause physical harm or injury to another person. While bullying can be a form of violence, not all violence involves the repeated and intentional targeting of an individual as seen in bullying.
the use of physical force to harm somone or something
Overcrowding, lack of security measures, inadequate staff training, gang presence, and limited access to resources such as education and mental health services can contribute to prison violence. These factors can create a volatile environment that increases the likelihood of conflicts between inmates escalating into violence.
It depends on what you do. If you are just a racist when you talk to people, then no. If you make everything public and shout it out, you would most likely go to jail or be fined by the police.
Hate speech and speech likely to incite violence are not protected .
Hate speech criminalization is a major limitation on speech. Diversity people are granted special protection by big government so as to prevent their hurt feelings and prevent them from reacting with violence toward a hate speaker. If a Diversity person or a hate speaker react with any form of violence, only the hate speaker is necessarily subject to government prosecution for hate speech. The intent of hate speech criminalization is to chill criticism of Diversity people. Another limitation on speech is free speech zones designated by big government. Outside a free speech zone a speaker is subject to arrest and prosecution.
Hate and intolerance begets violence and murder.
Hate speech is any form of communication that promotes discrimination, hostility, or violence against individuals or groups based on attributes such as race, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, gender, or disability. Types of hate speech can include slurs, threats, harassment, and dehumanizing language targeting specific groups.
Hate speech refers to any form of communication that expresses discrimination, hostility, or violence towards a particular group based on characteristics such as race, religion, sexual orientation, gender, or nationality. It can incite harm, violence, or discrimination against individuals or groups and is often used to spread fear and promote discrimination. Hate speech is not protected under freedom of speech laws in many countries due to its harmful and damaging impact on society.
Hate speech criminalization is a major limitation on speech. Diversity people are granted special protection by big government so as to prevent their hurt feelings and prevent them from reacting with violence toward a hate speaker. If a Diversity person or a hate speaker react with any form of violence, only the hate speaker is necessarily subject to government prosecution for hate speech. The intent of hate speech criminalization is to chill criticism of Diversity people. Another limitation on speech is free speech zones designated by big government. Outside a free speech zone a speaker is subject to arrest and prosecution.
It is illegal to write content that promotes hate speech, incites violence, or violates copyright laws in a book.
No, giving a speech is not considered a criminal act unless the content of the speech incites violence or is a form of hate speech that is prohibited by law. In most cases, a speech is protected by freedom of speech laws.
Yes, if the speech is considered threatening, harassment, or incitement to violence, it can lead to arrest. Additionally, hate speech or defamation can also result in legal consequences.
Outside the law, hate speech is any speech that attacks a person or group on the basis of e.g. race, religion, gender, disability, or sexual orientation.According to the law, hate speech is any speech, gesture or conduct, writing, or display which is forbidden because it may incite violence or prejudicial action against or by a protected individual or group, or because it disparages or intimidates a protected individual or group.Some examples of hate speech are:A group of white recasts burning a cross on the yard of a black family (R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul, 1992)Talking in a way that promotes violence against a specific religious group, homosexuals, an ethnic group, etc.
Hate speech is not a crime in most cases, but it can be if it is coupled with threats or meant to incite violence. Private citizens never have the right to file criminal complaints. Criminal activity should be reported to the police.
Martin Luther King (Jnr), originally Micheal Luther King (Jnr), didn't believe in violence and took it upon himself to end segregation in the USA. He succeeded. He believed that Violence, when used, only increased the violence. A quote from his speech shows this remarkably well; 'Violence only begets violence... Hate cannot end hate, only love can do that'