Totally not real it looks so fake there is no animal like that like what kind of wolf has wings with long sharp teeth is soo no real
==========
The first report of the Chupacabra came around 1995 from a lady in Puerto Rico who gave a description that was pretty much identical to creature "Sil" in the science-fiction Horror film Species (which she had recently watched). Wildlife management officials and biologists agree that it is fictitious. The most common confirmed (supposed) sightings have all been.dogs with mange (which can look really weird but incidentally nothing like the "heavy creature, the size of a small bear, with a row of spines reaching from the neck to the base of the tail" of the original reports. Despite it's name (roughly translated as "goat sucker") and reputation, none of the supposed victims have ever actually been confirmed via necropsy to have been drained of their blood - in fact, all of the supposed victims that have been examined have been found to have NOT been bled dry (obviously some had lost some blood through wounds, but just from bleeding, not from being sucked dry).
yes they are
chupacabras are known scientificly to be real and reproduce by eggs. it usually depends on kind of species it is. take for instance a chupracabra is like a bat and reproduces yep that's wut i know from watching the history channel yep so this is all REAL !!!!
Chupacabras are mythical creatures from folklore and are not real, so they do not have a population.
No, chupacabras are said to have greenish-gray scaley skin.
because chupacabras are mythical i would assume they excrete rainbows..
no
Chupacabras are most closely related to tazmanian tigers and i believe that chupacabras are just a population of tazmanian tigers that escaped from zoos when they were still in them
In MExico
yes
The cast of Chupacabras - 2000 includes: Jorge Flores as himself Patricio Serna as himself
no because they only been seen to eat barnyard animals
in Mexico