Fossil evidence showing similar plant and animal species in regions that are now widely separated provides support for Wegner's hypothesis of continental drift. This suggests that the continents were once connected in a single landmass.
Fossil evidence supporting Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift included identical fossils found on separate continents, showing that these landmasses were once connected. This supported the idea that continents had drifted apart over time. Additionally, the presence of ancient glacial deposits in regions that are now too warm for glaciers to form suggested that these areas were once located closer to the South Pole.
The hypothesis statement could be: "There is no significant difference in the quality of well water compared to filtered water in terms of cleanliness and safety." This hypothesis can be tested through water quality testing to determine if there is any notable variance between the two water sources.
There were four peices of evidence: 1. He noticed that the some of the continents fit together like a puzzle. 2. He found the same fossils in both continents, this is only possible if they were once touching each other. 3. There were the same kind of mountains in canada and Europe, the only way this is possible is if the two plates once collided. 4. 250 million years ago there were ice sheets in southern Africa, India, and Australia and this is only possible if they once touched Antartica.
To support the idea that language is culturally transmitted, researchers used evidence of the studies of birds when they begin to produce songs. They concluded that id birds are kept isolated from hearing birds their speech will be abnormal versus a bird hearing songs other birds called.
Major rivers on different continents match
Fossil evidence showing similar plant and animal species in regions that are now widely separated provides support for Wegner's hypothesis of continental drift. This suggests that the continents were once connected in a single landmass.
Well...it all depends on the hypothesis. For example, if you know exactly how to back it up with evidence, than very easy. But...if your hypothesis is kind of 'far out', and finding evidence will be difficult, then writing it will be hard.
Fossil evidence supporting Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift included identical fossils found on separate continents, showing that these landmasses were once connected. This supported the idea that continents had drifted apart over time. Additionally, the presence of ancient glacial deposits in regions that are now too warm for glaciers to form suggested that these areas were once located closer to the South Pole.
experimental evidence that supports the new idea
Yes, it doesnt matterwhat kind of evidence there is, as long as it supports your case.
A result which is consistent with a hypothesis adds weight to the evidence in favour of that hypothesis: it makes it more likely that the hypothesis is true. But you can never ever confirm a scientific hypothesis. The best that you can do is to show that an alternative hypothesis is unlikely. There could be another hypothesis which is better than the one you started with as well as the alternative that you compared it with: but you simply do not know.
A problem is a situation that presents difficulty or challenge, while a hypothesis is a proposed explanation or prediction based on limited evidence. Problems require solving and can lead to the formulation of hypotheses as part of the problem-solving process.
This is a "proof by contradiction", where the evidence would fail to support the reverse assumption, giving credence to the original hypothesis.
A hypothesis is a statement that proposes a relationship between two or more variables and is based on prior scientific research or observation. It is testable through experimentation and observation to determine if there is evidence to support or reject the proposed relationship. The results of these tests can help researchers draw conclusions about the validity of the hypothesis.
The evidence from the fossil record is considered the strongest support for other forms of evidence in evolution. Fossils provide a physical record of past organisms, showing changes over time and the relationships between different species. This evidence complements genetic, anatomical, and embryological evidence to provide a comprehensive understanding of evolutionary processes.
scientists use scientific method as a tool to answer their questions or hypothesis.