Should buyers of energy-efficient motor vehicles receive large rebates funded by fees levied on gas guzzlers and explain?

Answer 1

Bro/sis/thing, you need to stop wiki searching the answers to your environmental science homework (especially if you are reading Miller and Spoolman, you know what I mean!). The answer to question 5 of the Critical thinking Questions in Chapter 16 of Living in the Environment (2012, Cengage learning) can only be answered by:

a. Your teacher

b. you

c. that cool nerd dude who has the same science teacher as you

This question cannot be answered by the internet, unless

a. the dude who takes your class happens to be your fb friend

b. your teacher told you to copy the answers from her website

c. you are cheating.

So I suggest that instead of looking for an answer from the internet, you take these quick clues and run off home to Google drive where you can answer that ES homework:

1. "Gas-guzzling" is a vague term that should be replaced with a more reliable definition (e.g. all cars driving less than 10 miles per gallon).

2. What is an energy efficient motor vehicle anyways? (define it)

3. How long can this legislation go on before it is outdated or needs to be reformed?

4. What is the effect of this tax on the economy?

5. Is it fair to the "gas guzzling" companies? If not, is the unfairness justified by the environmental benefits of

Further points of note:

what the heck is the definition of a large rebate anyways? Is this a hypothetical theory question? It can't be, because we are talking about something that is very concrete and has very significant limitations and consequences.

P.S. don't feel to bad about it, I was searching the same thing just for the heck of it (I'm anonoymous in case you were wondering).

If you just happened to write the exact question that was in a High School AP Environmental Science Textbook, then sorry about the confusion I have caused. Have a nice day!