answersLogoWhite

0

Advantages: Protects internal belongings & gives people a sense of security

Disadvantages: Do not work with an earthquake that is large on the Richter scale & costs a lot of money so not necessarily suitable for LEDCs

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Earth Science

Are buildings in San Francisco earthquake proof?

Buildings in San Francisco are designed to be earthquake-resistant rather than completely earthquake-proof. They are engineered to withstand a certain level of seismic activity and minimize damage in the event of an earthquake. Retrofitting older buildings and adhering to strict building codes help improve their resilience to earthquakes.


Why did some of the buildings survive the Kobe earthquake and some did'NT?

Buildings that were retrofitted to withstand earthquakes or those built with seismic design features were more likely to survive the Kobe earthquake. On the other hand, older buildings or structures that were poorly constructed were more susceptible to damage or collapse. Additionally, the soil composition and proximity to the fault line also played a role in determining which buildings survived and which did not.


Why are earthquake proof building hard to make?

Earthquake-proof buildings are difficult to make because earthquakes produce powerful and unpredictable forces that can cause structural damage. Designing buildings to withstand these forces requires expertise in structural engineering, advanced materials, and construction techniques. Additionally, building codes and regulations for seismic safety must be strictly followed to ensure the building's resilience during an earthquake.


Should buildings built near fault lines be earthquake proof?

Yes, buildings constructed near fault lines should be designed to withstand earthquakes. Implementing earthquake-resistant techniques and materials can help minimize damage and protect occupants during seismic events. Prioritizing safety measures in these areas is essential to reduce the impact of earthquakes on both people and structures.


When was the first earthquake proof building built?

The first earthquake-proof building, known as the 'Torre Latinoamericana', was built in Mexico City in 1956. It has since withstood several earthquakes and serves as a model for earthquake-resistant design in high-risk areas.

Related Questions

What country are earthquake proof buildings?

japan


Who invented earthquake resistant buildings?

The person who invented earthquake proof buildings was called Proffessor Boermel


Where would it be of most importance to have earthquake proof buildings?

Japan


Why do people build earthquake proof buildings?

So that they/their items are not destroyed.


How do they earthquake proof buildings?

The build the buildings up strong and they make sure that the doorways are nice and sturdy


Why does a underedevolped country suffer more from earthquake?

They can't afford to have earthquake proof buildings and so suffer more


Why are earthquake proof buildings only found in some earthquake prone areas?

Earthquake proof buildings are not common worldwide due to the high costs associated with their construction. In areas with frequent earthquakes, like Japan and California, there is more incentive to invest in earthquake resistant technology. Additionally, building codes and regulations in these regions often require construction to meet certain seismic standards.


How has architects tried to design earthquake proof high rise buildings?

because they make it earth quake proof dummy


Are most buildings around the world earthquake proof?

No, most buildings around the world are not earthquake-proof. Many older buildings were not designed to withstand strong earthquakes, and building codes and construction standards vary widely between regions, leading to some buildings being more vulnerable to seismic activity than others. Upgrading existing buildings to be more earthquake-resistant and enforcing strict building codes for new construction can help mitigate this risk.


Should laws say that buildings built near faults must be earthquake proof explain?

Yes, laws should require buildings built near faults to be earthquake-proof to protect the safety of occupants and minimize property damage. Earthquake-proof buildings are designed to withstand strong seismic forces and reduce the risk of collapse during an earthquake, which is crucial in high-risk areas. This proactive measure can help save lives and mitigate the impact of earthquakes on communities living near faults.


What advantages and disadvantages of using metal in trains?

It's strong and fire proof - but its expensive.


Are buildings in San Francisco earthquake proof?

Buildings in San Francisco are designed to be earthquake-resistant rather than completely earthquake-proof. They are engineered to withstand a certain level of seismic activity and minimize damage in the event of an earthquake. Retrofitting older buildings and adhering to strict building codes help improve their resilience to earthquakes.