The evidence of the theory of continental drift can be found on the edges of the tectonic plates. For example, the boundary of the African Plate and the Eurasian plate is in the Mediterranean Sea, just south of the island of Crete. At this boundary, scientists have observed that the Eurasian Plate is sliding under the African Plate at a rate of three to four centimeters per year as the African Plate drifts north.
Scientists support the idea of a supercontinent called Pangaea through evidence such as matching coastlines, similar rock formations, and identical fossils found on different continents. Additionally, the movement of tectonic plates, as recorded by magnetic anomalies in the ocean floor, provides further support for the theory of continental drift.
Yes, scientists were using the scientific process when they rejected the continental drift theory. The process involves proposing a hypothesis, testing it through observations and experiments, and revising or rejecting it based on the evidence. In this case, scientists rejected the theory because they did not find enough supporting evidence at the time.
The evidence supporting continental drift emerged in the early to mid-20th century, with key contributions from scientists like Alfred Wegener and Arthur Holmes. By the 1960s, advancements in technology, such as ocean floor mapping and paleomagnetism, provided further support for the theory.
Scientists use the magnetic properties of some minerals as evidence of past changes in Earth's magnetic field. These changes can provide insight into the Earth's geological history, including continental drift and past climates.
Scientists use evidence such as matching fossil records, rock formations, and geological structures across continents, as well as the fit of the continents themselves, to support the theory of continental drift. Additionally, studies of oceanic crust age and magnetic patterns on the seafloor provide further evidence for plate tectonics and continental movement.
Scientist rejected Wegners hypothesis of continental drift at first because he did not have enogh evidence to support his theory. He failed to provide a suitable mechanism that could cause the continents to move.
There was no evidence to prove it
Evidence that scientists found.
Scientists support the idea of a supercontinent called Pangaea through evidence such as matching coastlines, similar rock formations, and identical fossils found on different continents. Additionally, the movement of tectonic plates, as recorded by magnetic anomalies in the ocean floor, provides further support for the theory of continental drift.
Scientist rejected Wegners hypothesis of continental drift at first because he did not have enogh evidence to support his theory. He failed to provide a suitable mechanism that could cause the continents to move.
It was Alfred Wegener but other scientists did not believe him but he found evidence
Yes, scientists were using the scientific process when they rejected the continental drift theory. The process involves proposing a hypothesis, testing it through observations and experiments, and revising or rejecting it based on the evidence. In this case, scientists rejected the theory because they did not find enough supporting evidence at the time.
The evidence supporting continental drift emerged in the early to mid-20th century, with key contributions from scientists like Alfred Wegener and Arthur Holmes. By the 1960s, advancements in technology, such as ocean floor mapping and paleomagnetism, provided further support for the theory.
Scientists use the magnetic properties of some minerals as evidence of past changes in Earth's magnetic field. These changes can provide insight into the Earth's geological history, including continental drift and past climates.
Which type of evidence was NOT used by Alfred Wegener to support his continental drift hypothesis human remains
Scientists use evidence such as matching fossil records, rock formations, and geological structures across continents, as well as the fit of the continents themselves, to support the theory of continental drift. Additionally, studies of oceanic crust age and magnetic patterns on the seafloor provide further evidence for plate tectonics and continental movement.
human remains