0
One key piece of information Wegener did not have was the mechanism behind the movement of the continental plates, which is now explained by plate tectonics. Additionally, he lacked detailed evidence from the ocean floor, such as magnetic striping patterns, that further support the theory of continental drift. Finally, Wegener's theory would have been strengthened by more comprehensive fossil and rock evidence to show past connections between continents.
What else can I help you with?
What was one question that Alfred wegener could not answer?
One question Alfred Wegener could not answer was the mechanism that caused the movement of continents, as he proposed the theory of continental drift before the discovery of plate tectonics. He could not explain how or why continents would be able to move through solid oceanic crust.
Why would wegener have considered the presence of coal in Pennsylvania evidence of continental drift?
Wegener would have considered the presence of coal in Pennsylvania as evidence of continental drift because coal forms from the remains of ancient plants, which typically grow in swampy environments. The presence of coal in Pennsylvania suggests that the region was once located in a different climate zone, which aligns with the idea of continents moving over time. This supports Wegener's theory of continental drift, which proposed that the continents were once connected and have since moved apart.
Where did wegener look for proof that would support his theory of continental drift?
Alfred Wegener looked for several lines of evidence to support his theory of continental drift, including the fit of the continents like puzzle pieces, matching geological formations across continents, similarities in fossils and plants, and evidence from paleoclimate data such as glacial deposits.
Why did Wegener's idea get rejected by scientists?
Scientist rejected Wegners hypothesis of continental drift at first because he did not have enogh evidence to support his theory. He failed to provide a suitable mechanism that could cause the continents to move.
What happened to Alfred Wegener?
he died a very tragic deathas people would not beileve his theorys about the earths crust moving over timeas he kept 'bangin' on about i they decided that they had had enough of it. so they gripped him and threw him over seas when they where out at sea fishing#and me[R] and my sister [N] would obviously know this coz we are hiS GREAT GREAT GREAT granKIDZ .!!! thankyooooou x
How old was harry hess when wegener died?
Alfred Wegener died in November 1930. Harry Hess was born on May 24th, 1906. That would mean that Harry was 24 when Wegener died.
How would you reply to strongs arguments?
No, arguments can either be strong or weak, however, a valid argument would be considered a sound argument. The opposite would be an invalid argument.
How do you find information on marriage matchmakers in 16th century England?
In general marriages were arranged by parents. They would marry off their daughters to wealthy men, so the family and its connections were strengthened.
How would you reply to josiah strong arguments?
No, arguments can either be strong or weak, however, a valid argument would be considered a sound argument. The opposite would be an invalid argument.
What is an adjective for argument?
The adjective form of argument is argumentative.
Who came up with Pangaea?
A young german scientist named Alfred Wegener came up with it.Alfred Wegener of Germany.Wegener pronounced Veg-ner.He died in Iceland trying to prove his theory and is now frozen in a glacier
Is the scientist who first proposed the existence of Pangaea and Panthalassa.?
That would be Alfred Wegener
Can an Argument be Noid?
No, an argument cannot be void. An argument can be weak, flawed, or unconvincing, but it still retains its basic structure and content. A void argument would imply that there is no argument at all.
What would be an example of argument?
Fighting
Something you agree to accept or to do in order to reach argument or end an argument?
I believe that would be a compromise.
What is the part of an argument that is flawed and makes the argument invalid an error in reasoning?
That would be a moot point
What would make a good argument?
it would have to depend on the topic.
