== == Young Earth Creationism is one of two streams into which Creationism can be divided (the other being Old Earth Creationism which also accepts a divine creator, but agrees with mainstream science that the scientific evidence points to the world being immensely old and that species have evolved through the process of evolution).
Young Earth Creationism is a world-view that interprets scientific evidence based on a literal or semi-literal reading of the Biblical book of Genesis and thus teaches that the world is only about 6,000 years old. Young Earth Creationists believe that living things were created by God much as we know them today and that the various species have diversified within the genetic pool of their original kind.
The two main kinds of Creationism are young Earth Creationism, which believes in a literal interpretation of the Bible and asserts that the Earth is only a few thousand years old, and old Earth Creationism, which accepts scientific evidence for the age of the Earth but still believes in a divine creator.
OEC is an umbrella term for various ideas on the Creation. These include the Gap Theory and Progressive Creationism. Suggest you look it up via the phrase 'old earth creationism' as it it too long to summarize here.
According to creationism, the Earth is less than 10,000 years old, and is usually found to be around 6,000 years old. This results from an interpretation of Biblical genealogies.
Of course the Bible first proposed young earth creationism on account of their being a fairly strict chronology given in scripture. The descendants of Adam along with the number of years separating the patriarchs and a apporoximate time for the kings of Judah, includes a rough estimate of when the earth was created and when the Great Flood occurred. It was beginning in the mid-nineteenth century when various British theologians considered the possibility that the Bible should not be taken too literally and that the geology and science contradicted the scriptural record. The travels and subsequent ideas of Charles Darwin convinced many they were on the right track. (Of course, some only believed in an ancient earth after Darwin's book was published.) Ironically it was mostly clergymen on both sides of the Atlantic that promoted the idea of the earth being many millions of years old. It is also ironic that almost 100 years before scientific dating, Charles Lyell, came out with his classic geology text that amazingly and accurately (!) already accounted for the many millions of years separating our currently accepted geological eras. Modern belief in a young earth arose in the late 1950s and 60s with the classic apology for young earth creatiionism, The Genesis Flood, by Henry Morris and John Whitcomb. Here was a text of over 500 pages that invoked selective scientific evidence for a young earth, in many cases from the writings and abstracts of evolutionists themselves. For some, the history of our earth and universe seemed to make sense for the first time and the inerrant accuracy of scripture was once again restored. The impact of The Genesis Flood cannot be underestimated as it exposed a soft underbelly of evolutionism many had never considered before. Perhaps it was from this point onward that a real threat to established scientific convention began to emerge and many scientists began classifying creationism as pseudoscience while believers readily saw evolutionism as a religion on its own called scientific naturalism. The Intelligent Design movement is not necessarily a young earth creationist movement but rather a movement emerging from the university environment that tried to uncouple creationism with the Bible and its largely Baptist roots.
A Young-Earth creationist steadfastly refuses to accept the scientific evidence for the age of the earth and insists that God created the earth only a few thousand years ago. An Old-Earth creationist accepts the scientific evidence for the age of the earth but insists that God created the earth and all living things.Both are trying to reconcile their understanding of the Book of Genesis with the real world around us, but the Old-Earth creationist is perhaps a little more flexible and takes a more realistic approach. This leaves him with the dilemma of how to explain Genesis chapter 1, which says the world was created in just six days. The most common attempt at explanation is to suggest that the 'days' were not days in our understanding, but very long periods of time, an explanation that can only be described as full of holes.Both tend to conflate the first creation account (Genesis 1:1-2:4a) with the second creation account (Genesis 2:4bff), treating the second creation account as the fuller description of the creation of man, from the first account. Here, a generally unrecognised problem for the Old-Earth creationist is that the biblical genealogy of Adam only allows the earth to be around six thousand years old, with no benefit achieved from the semantic arguments about just how long a biblical 'day' was.For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
The two main kinds of Creationism are young Earth Creationism, which believes in a literal interpretation of the Bible and asserts that the Earth is only a few thousand years old, and old Earth Creationism, which accepts scientific evidence for the age of the Earth but still believes in a divine creator.
Old Earth Creationism is a belief that God created the universe and life on Earth over a long period of time, in alignment with scientific evidence such as the age of the Earth and fossil records. This differs from Young Earth Creationism, which holds that the Earth is only a few thousand years old and that all life was created in a short period of time. Old Earth Creationism reconciles religious beliefs with scientific findings, while Young Earth Creationism rejects much of mainstream science in favor of a literal interpretation of religious texts.
Creationism is the belief that the earth and living things derive from explicit acts of Divine Creation. For young-Earth creationists, this comprises a literal understanding of the Book of Genesis and the disbelief in Evolution. Here are some websites for creationism including young-earth, old-earth, and intelligent design creationism. Answers in Genesis: Young-earth creationist department, which operates a Creation Museum. Access Research Network: Advocates of Intellectual Design Creationism. Center for Science and Culture: Intelligent design belief. Part of the Seattle-based Discovery Institute. Creation Ministries International: Young-earth creationists. Creation Research Society: Research arm of the creation Institute. Institute for Creation Research: A central group of young-earth creationism.
Young Earth creationism asserts that the earth and universe were created by God in a literal six days about 6,000-10,000 years ago, as described in the Bible, whereas Old Earth creationism accommodates scientific dating methods and allows for a much older age of the earth and universe, but still believes in a divine creator. Both views seek to reconcile scientific and religious beliefs, but differ in their interpretations of the age of the earth and universe.
Many Christian denominations realise that the concepts of young-earth creationism are implausible. They have to accept the facts of science or risk being seen as irrelevant by an increasing number of parishioners.For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
reconciliation of Creation with Evolution is the view of Old-Earth Creationism, which holds that God made the universe and then guided Evolution over long epochs.In repudiation of Evolution, however, Young-Earth Creationism holds that God created the universe and living things relatively recently without the use of Evolution.See also:Is there evidence for Creation?Can you show that God exists?Seeing God's wisdom
There are at least two, quite different forms of creationism, and the question of whether creationism is credible must be applied separately to each. No doubt, both Young-Earth creationism and Old-Earth creationism are credible to their proponents, but the question must be whether they are credible to other well informed people.Young-Earth creationism holds that the Earth is only a few thousand years old, usually around six thousand. However, science has proven conclusively that the world is billions of years old, so this can not be credible. Because of the overwhelming evidence that the world is certainly more than six thousand years old, some Young-Earth creationists have adapted Young-Earth creationism by saying that each of the days stated in Genesis chapter 1 was really an almost indefinite period of time. According to this version, the world could be many thousands of years old. This not only undermines the standard Young-Earth creationism argument, but it is even less credible, given that there is no supporting evidence for this, not even biblical evidence.Old-Earth creationism accepts the scientific evidence for the great age of the Earth, so from this point of view it is more credible than Young-Earth creationism. Nevertheless, some Old-Earth creationists say that God created all living things just as they are today. Others accept that species evolved, but say that this was not the result of natural selection but Intelligent Design. Both versions of Old-Earth creationism fail in the face of scientific evidence, although Intelligent Design is more sophisticated and therefore somewhat more credible. Intelligent Design is also claimed by some Young-Earth creationists, perhaps because it has captured the imagination of a proportion of the population, but it seems inherently an Old-Earth creationism concept.Ultimately credibility comes down to whether a hypothesis is compatible with the scientific evidence. Creationists do not put forward scientific evidence to support their hypotheses, instead proposing various ways in which they believe they can undermine the evidence for evolution. Occasionally, scientists respond (eg. Dawkins, Perakh, et al)and demonstrate the failure of these arguments. So, to be credible, creationism has to adapt further, until its claims are at least somewhat consistent with the scientific evidence.For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
Christians are divided between; From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Old Earth creationism is a variant of the creationist view of the origin of the universe and life on Earth. As a theory of origins it is typically more compatible with mainstream scientific thought on the issues of geology, cosmology and the age of the Earth, in comparison to Young Earth creationism. However, it still generally takes the accounts of creation in Genesis more literally than theistic evolution (or evolutionary creationism).Old Earth creationism is in fact an umbrella term for a number of perspectives, including Gap creationism and Progressive creationism. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaYoung Earth creationism is the religious belief that the Earth and life on Earth were created by a direct act of God dating between 6,000 and 10,000 years ago. Its adherents are Christians, Muslims or Jews who believe that God created the Earth in six 24-hour days, taking the Hebrew text of Genesis as a literal account.
Creationism comes in two significantly different varieties. Traditional creationism, often known as ‘Young-earth Creationism’ holds that the world was created in just six days, and only a few thousand years ago. Old-earth Creationists accept that science has proven its case, that the world is over four billion years old. They seek to harmonise this with the Bible by looking for innovative ways of interpreting the Book of Genesis, to allow both science and the Bible to be seen as true.Many people now believe the biblical account of creation to be a myth, but 'creationism' is more than a myth. Whether we look at Young-earth Creationism or Old-earth Creationism, it is a quite modern set of beliefs designed to support belief in God as the ultimate creator of the world.
Stop and think about it. If you are into creationism, then what won't be included? People who take the approach of creationism believe that absolutely everything, without exception, was created. You might be asking if creationists believe that solar processes may have been involved in various changes that have happened to earth and her inventory of living and non-living things. That would probably depend on what branch of creationism you are talking about. "Young Earth" creationists probably hold more to an absolute, fundamentalist approach to creation, with little if anything resulting from lengthy 'natural' processes. Other creationists dismiss 'young earth' ideas outright and are more likely to be open to any number of natural processes, including ones involving the sun.
Creationism.
Old-earth creationism is a form of creationism opposite to young-earth creationism. The central tenet of old-earth creationism is that the Earth is as old as scientific evidence says it is, at around 4.5 billion years. Old-earth creationism comes in three main forms but the main goal is to reconcile the authority of the Bible with the relatively new authority of modern science. It has become increasingly popular amongst Christianity over the past century as accumulating scientific evidence forced many churches to reconsider their previous interpretation of Genesis. Old-earth creationism and evolution is accepted by the Catholic Church as well as many mainstream Protestant churches.All old-earth creationists accept that the Earth is about 4.5 billion years old, and the Universe about 13.7, but have varying views on the specific development of the Earth and life. These are the three main views.Progressive creation: God developed the Universe, Earth, and life through divine acts over millions to billions of years, allowing some forms of evolution to occur, but directly intervening to create new life at key points in Earth's history. Purely naturalistic evolution cannot account for the complexity and diversity of life.Theistic evolution: Acceptance that evolution is the process by which life developed, but that God was a guiding force in this process. Through evolution God let all forms of life appear over time.Gap creation: This view is based on the belief that there is a "gap" in time between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2. Earth is as old as science says it is, but was destroyed at one point by God, only to be recreated in six, 24-hour days. This belief is much less popular than it once was.The opposing view is young-earth creationism, which is based on a literal interpretation of Genesis and believes that the Earth is only around 6,000 years old.