The brutal repression of workers that inevitably resulted from a laissez-faire system was the evidence used to impose government regulation over businesses and force them to act more humanely.
It led to the breakup of the company as a monopoly.
A claim of policy is a statement that advocates for a specific course of action or solution to a problem. It often suggests changes to laws, regulations, or practices and is supported by evidence and reasoning. This type of claim typically addresses issues of governance, social justice, or public health, arguing for what should be done to improve a situation. The effectiveness of a claim of policy depends on the strength of the argument and the feasibility of the proposed actions.
An illustration argument presents a claim supported by specific examples that clarify or reinforce the point being made. For instance, if someone argues that regular exercise improves mental health, they might cite studies showing reduced anxiety and depression levels among individuals who engage in physical activity, alongside personal anecdotes of people who have experienced these benefits. This blend of empirical evidence and personal stories strengthens the argument by making it relatable and concrete.
Disputing an argument on the basis of the facts involves challenging the validity or truth of the claims made by presenting evidence or data that contradicts those claims. This process relies on objective information rather than personal opinions or beliefs, aiming to clarify misunderstandings or highlight inaccuracies. By focusing on factual discrepancies, one can strengthen their position and promote a more informed discussion. Ultimately, it seeks to uphold a standard of truth and rational discourse.
There is evidence that soaring health insurance premiums do more than swell the ranks of the uninsured. They boost unemployment, push more workers into part-time jobs, and force employees to sacrifice wages and other benefits just to retain some measure of coverage.
Evidence to support the argument is needed for a sound argument.
evidence to support the argument
Providing evidence to support an argument strengthens it by adding credibility and persuasiveness. It shows that the argument is based on facts and research, making it more convincing to the audience.
An argument is a claim or viewpoint that is supported by evidence or reasons. Supporting evidence can include facts, statistics, examples, expert opinions, or logical reasoning that back up the argument being made. It is important to use strong and relevant evidence to persuade others and strengthen the validity of the argument.
An argument from silence is an argument based on the absence of something being mentioned in documents as evidence.
It is very important to examine the evidence of an argument in order to come to a valid conclusion for said argument. If one does not have all the evidence, an invalid conclusion could be made.
An analogy can be persuasive, or it can help people to understand your argument, but it isnt EVIDENCE.
An argument from design is a theological term for a teleological argument - an argument for the existence of God, such that because nature is orderly, it is evidence of a designer.
It was not based on evidence and experiment. - Alex Learning
Textual evidence serves as the foundation for an interpretive argument by providing concrete support for an analysis or claim. It helps to validate interpretations and allows readers to follow the logic of the argument. Effective use of textual evidence can strengthen the persuasiveness and credibility of the overall argument.
The argument from silence is when the absence of evidence is used to either support or refute a claim or theory. If there is no evidence to support a claim, it can be refuted using the argument from silence. Conversely, if there is a lack of evidence against a claim, it can be supported using the argument from silence.
Supporting evidence