1 Generally a unconvincing arguement. 2 More formally, a illogical arguement.
1 I am right cause, well, I am right.
2 All widjets are blue, therefore the moon is made of cheese.
The Answer is Regonalization is the dota weak dota na lng weak region 1 weak dota weakweakweakweakBOSS BALITA DOTA WEAK!
Principal argument for deficit spending is the central point of controversy in economics.
Which statement reflects an accurate argument in favor of a command economy
weak the GDP in billions is $56.83
what makes the economy weak
An argument that is weak is, by definition, uncogent....
Yes, a valid argument can still be weak if the premises provided are not strong or relevant enough to support the conclusion. Validity refers to the logical structure of an argument, while the strength of an argument refers to the quality and persuasiveness of the premises.
Valid arguments are not described as strong or weak. Validity refers to the logical structure of an argument - if the premises logically lead to the conclusion. An argument can be valid but still weak if the premises are not well-supported or sound.
A valid argument is certainly stronger than an invalid argument. but an argument can be valid and still be relatively weak. Validity and strength are not the same, although they are both good features for an argument to have.
A strong argument is one that is logically sound, supported by evidence and reasoning, and addresses counterarguments effectively. A weak argument lacks evidence, has logical fallacies, and relies on emotional appeals rather than facts.
"Its" indicates belonging, as in something belongs to "it":The paper has a stamp --> its stamp ("it" meaning the paper)The argument had a weak thesis --> its weak thesis ("it" meaning the argument)
one side tries to find the weak parts of the opposing sides argument
No, an argument cannot be void. An argument can be weak, flawed, or unconvincing, but it still retains its basic structure and content. A void argument would imply that there is no argument at all.
imagine it with a spanish accent and weak comebacks
Yes, if the conclusion of an argument is just as likely to be false as it is to be true based on the premises provided, then the argument is considered weak because it does not provide strong support for the conclusion. The premises should logically lead to the conclusion, rather than leaving it equally likely to be true or false.
one side tries to find the weak parts of the opposing sides argument
No, arguments can either be strong or weak, however, a valid argument would be considered a sound argument. The opposite would be an invalid argument.