0
What is one benefit received as a result of government spending?
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How can government spending trigger a chain of events that helps to improve the economy?
This theory comes from John Maynard Keynes's theories on the economy. High government spending (AKA running a budget deficit) means that there is an increased demand in the market for business output, which will result in increased employment, which will result in higher incomes, which will result in increased consumer spending, which well then result in even more demand. This practice is theoretically most useful to bring an economy out of a recession and reverse high unemployment.
Does reducing government spending improve or exacerbate an ailing economy?
It may temporarily improve the government's bottom line, but because government spending is such a large part of a country's economy, the net result is a drastic negative impact on the economy where entire industries (such a defense contractors) may cease to exist.
How can the government encourage more spending?
Firstly, the Aggregate Demand consists of [ C + I + G +(X-M) ]. Government spending being one of the component of AD will affect the GDP. In this case, higher AD will boost the national income by a multiple amount through the multiplier effect.Next, government spending can be in the form of education, training, subsidies etc. This definitely will benefit the society in terms of lower price (Subsidies), able to fetch higher factor income in future (Education), increased productivity (Training) and much more! In a nutshell, the initial increase in G will in turn result in increased C , I and even X!
What is the economic term that describes the increased benefit or satisfaction you will enjoy as a result of consuming one more of something?
The economic term that describes the increased benefit or satisfaction we the peopleÊwill enjoy as a result of consuming more than one of something is called as marginal benefit. It gives the extra benefit gained in the consumption of one more unit and works better than calculating the average benefit, in this case.
How do taxes affect money supply?
Under the current economic circumstances in the USA, that is, government spending remains far above tax receipts, the treasury issuing bonds which are purchased by the Federal Reserve using quantitative easing, taxes will effect the money supply in an inverse relationship. That is, for every tax dollar collected, a dollar is removed from the money supply. Taxes are therefore deflationary under the current circumstances.In other times and circumstances, when government properly modulates its spending such that taxes and spending are closely related to each other, increase of taxes will result in an offsetting increase in spending. In this case, taxation is not deflationary or inflationary, and there is no net impact to the money supply.
What was one benefit of native Americans received as a result of the columbian exchange?
HorsesHorses
What was on benefit the colonies received as a result of the navigation acts passed by parliament?
The acts encouraged shipbuilding.
What was one benefit the colonies received as a result of the Navigation Acts passed by the Parliament?
The acts encouraged shipbuilding.
What was one benefit the colonies received as a result of the navigation acts pass by parliament?
The acts encouraged shipbuilding.
How can government spending trigger a chain of events that helps to improve the economy?
This theory comes from John Maynard Keynes's theories on the economy. High government spending (AKA running a budget deficit) means that there is an increased demand in the market for business output, which will result in increased employment, which will result in higher incomes, which will result in increased consumer spending, which well then result in even more demand. This practice is theoretically most useful to bring an economy out of a recession and reverse high unemployment.
What type of government spending is often the result of fiscal policy?
All government spending is ultimately the result of fiscal policy. Fiscal policy is another way of saying "how government spends money it raises through taxation to influence the economy". A government that believes it should not play a large part in driving economic demand through spending (a 'tight' fiscal policy) would typically raise and spend less than a government pursuing a 'loose' fiscal policy. If you count basic state expenditure on social security and healthcare as being non-negotiable then you might typically see a government engaged in discretionary spending such as large infrastructure projects as a result of fiscal policy (i.e. to directly employ the unemployed as workers and boost the economy). These kinds of discretionary spending most often result from fiscal policy. You may also want to explore the related links.
Does reducing government spending improve or exacerbate an ailing economy?
It may temporarily improve the government's bottom line, but because government spending is such a large part of a country's economy, the net result is a drastic negative impact on the economy where entire industries (such a defense contractors) may cease to exist.
How can the government encourage more spending?
Firstly, the Aggregate Demand consists of [ C + I + G +(X-M) ]. Government spending being one of the component of AD will affect the GDP. In this case, higher AD will boost the national income by a multiple amount through the multiplier effect.Next, government spending can be in the form of education, training, subsidies etc. This definitely will benefit the society in terms of lower price (Subsidies), able to fetch higher factor income in future (Education), increased productivity (Training) and much more! In a nutshell, the initial increase in G will in turn result in increased C , I and even X!
Can a government spending multiplier be a value of less than 1?
Quite simply, no. The Spending multiplier, even on government spending, will always have a value of greater than one. It really is self-evident; for that money to be subjected to a multiplier, it must be circulating multiple times, therefore the first circulation (the initial spending) would result in a multiplier of one, and subsequent spends would increase the multiplier further
Why the government spending multiplier is different form the tax multiplier?
The government spending multiplier is different form the tax multiplier from the top of my head is because the government spending total effect ripples off. That is if government spending increase then the total income increases. When total income increase, consumption increases, when consumption increases total income increases further (as consumption is a factor of total income), and this pattern is carried forward. This is the the multiplier effect, such that an increase in government spending's final impact on income is much bigger than its initial increase. The tax multiplier on the other hand, has a much smaller effect than government spending. This is because tax is only a portion of the consumer income. That is, if there is a tax cut, consumers only save a fractional amount (specifically 1-MPC) of a tax cut. As a result of the smaller boost in spending form ma tax cut, the ripples/multiplier effect of a tax cut is much less than an increase in government spending.
What is the result of high unemployment?
A decrease in consumer spending.
What is the reason for fiscal deficit in India?
The fiscal deficit in India is not fundamentally different from the fiscal deficit in any other country. The public always wants more government spending but they do not want more government taxes. The government attempts to oblige, by borrowing money. The result is a deficit.
