answersLogoWhite

0

Time is the factor here.

When you have more time, you do bidding and less time you do negotiating.


Eg - Assume you want a profitable supplier, so what you do is ask for quotations.


If you have enough time for the selection - You organize a tender and ask for quotations and select your desired ones leisurely


But


If it is urgent (less time) - You quickly seek quotations from your new suppliers via phone calls, email, faxes or any other available modes.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Economics

Difference between debt settlement and negotiation?

No difference, 2 different words for the same thing.


What are the differences between contracting by negotiation and sealed bidding?

Contracting by negotiation involves direct discussions between the buyer and potential contractors to reach an agreement, allowing for flexibility in terms and conditions. In contrast, sealed bidding requires contractors to submit their proposals in sealed envelopes by a specified deadline, with the bids publicly opened and evaluated based on predetermined criteria. Negotiation can lead to tailored solutions and adjustments based on feedback, while sealed bidding promotes transparency and fairness by treating all bidders equally. Ultimately, the choice between the two methods depends on the project's complexity and the desired level of interaction with bidders.


Why might negotiation be favored over competitive bidding in certain procurement situations?

When the product being purchased is fairly standard and readily available, most firms choose to utilize the competitive bidding process of supplier selection. This involves little or no negotiation. A request for bids is sent to a limited number of qualified suppliers asking for a price quote for the product, given the terms and conditions of the contract. The contract generally goes to the lowest bidder. For government bid requests, the contract legally must go to the lowest bidder qualified to fulfill the contract.


What is the difference between bargaining and negotiation?

Bargaining typically refers to the back-and-forth exchange of offers and counteroffers, often focused on price or specific terms, and can be more adversarial in nature. Negotiation, on the other hand, encompasses a broader process that includes not only the exchange of offers but also the exploration of interests, collaboration, and finding mutually beneficial solutions. While bargaining may be a component of negotiation, the latter often emphasizes relationship-building and long-term outcomes.


What is the difference between an offer and an invitation to negotiate?

An offer represents an explicit unilateral extension deal terms for an agreement/transaction. An invitation to negotiation is extending the opportunity for bi and multilateral discussions ideally towards an offer and ultimate resolution.

Related Questions

What is the difference between a multilateral negotiation and a bilateral negotiation?

this question has not yet been answered


What is the difference between negotiation and dialog?

You try to reach an agreement in a negotiation whereas you communicate information in a dialogue.


Difference between debt settlement and negotiation?

No difference, 2 different words for the same thing.


Negotiation between labor and management is called?

Negotiation between labor and management is called


What are the key differences between an offerer and an offeror in a contract negotiation?

An offerer is the party making an offer in a contract negotiation, while an offeror is the party receiving the offer. The key difference is that the offerer initiates the negotiation by proposing terms, while the offeror has the option to accept, reject, or counter the offer.


Difference between negotiation and advocacy?

A negotiation is any manner in which two or more parties deal with a conflict. An advocate is someone who assists an interested party in dealing with negotiations. so basically a negotiation is attempting to resolve a conflict and advocacy is helping a particular side or party in that process of resolving a conflict.


What is the difference between an offeror and an offerer in a contract negotiation?

In a contract negotiation, an offeror is the party making the offer, while an offerer is the party receiving the offer. The offeror presents the terms of the contract, and the offerer decides whether to accept or reject them.


What is the difference between negotiation OF meaning and negotiation FOR meaning?

Negotiation of meaning refers to the process in which speakers adjust their communication to enhance mutual understanding, often through clarification requests or repetitions when there is a misunderstanding. In contrast, negotiation for meaning focuses on the strategies and interactions that learners employ to achieve comprehension during language exchanges, emphasizing the active engagement in resolving communication breakdowns. Essentially, negotiation of meaning is about the adjustments made, while negotiation for meaning is about the strategies used to facilitate understanding.


What is the difference between an offeror and an offeree in a contract negotiation?

In a contract negotiation, the offeror is the party making the offer, while the offeree is the party receiving the offer. The offeror proposes the terms of the contract, and the offeree has the option to accept, reject, or counter the offer.


What is the main difference between negotiation and mediation?

Negotiation is when 2 people work out a deal and both people lose something in return to make each other happy.Mediation is when involves a third person making the problem easier for the two people to stop arguing.


What is the difference between debt negotiation and consolidation?

Debt Consolidation takes your debt and combines into one single loan, usually tied up in your house equity. Debt Negotiation on the other hand attempts to reduce the amount of debt you have by cutting the total amount you owe.


What does the term "best and final offer" mean in the context of negotiations or bidding processes?

"Best and final offer" refers to the last and most favorable proposal made by a party in a negotiation or bidding process. It indicates that the offer is the highest or best that the party is willing to make, and no further negotiations or changes will be considered.