In a country with an absolute monarchy, the monarch makes all of the decisions. Therefore, citizens in a country ruled by absolute monarchy has no decision making power.
Athenian citizens were actively involved in decision-making through a system of direct democracy, where they participated in the Assembly (Ekklesia) that met regularly to discuss and vote on important issues such as laws, war, and foreign policy. All male citizens over the age of 18 could attend and speak, allowing them to influence decisions directly. Additionally, a council known as the Boule, composed of selected citizens, prepared agendas for the Assembly and managed day-to-day affairs. This participatory approach ensured that citizens had a significant voice in the governance of Athens.
People in the US could be prevented from buying goods from a country that the US government has placed sanctions on.
Societal decision making refers to the processes through which communities or societies collectively make choices that affect their members and the environment. This often involves various stakeholders, including government entities, businesses, non-profits, and citizens, collaborating to address issues such as public policy, resource allocation, and social justice. Effective societal decision making typically emphasizes inclusivity, transparency, and the consideration of diverse perspectives to achieve outcomes that benefit the greater good.
In ancient Athens, important decisions were primarily made by the Assembly (Ekklesia), which consisted of male citizens who participated directly in governance. Key decisions included matters of war and peace, lawmaking, and the allocation of public funds. Additionally, the Council of 500 (Boule) played a crucial role in setting the agenda for the Assembly and preparing issues for discussion. The democratic process allowed for a wide range of citizens to engage in decision-making, although it excluded women, slaves, and non-citizens.
An individual decision is a decision that was made by one person. A group decision is a decision that was crafted by multiple people.
Describe the decision-making role of citizens in countries that are dictatorships and in countries that are absolute monarchies.
Yes, absolute monarchies have leaders who hold supreme authority over the state, typically embodied in a single monarch such as a king or queen. In this system, the monarch's powers are not constrained by laws or a constitution, allowing them to make decisions unilaterally. While they may have advisors or a council, the ultimate decision-making power rests solely with the monarch. Examples of absolute monarchies include Saudi Arabia and Brunei.
In authoritarian regimes, such as dictatorships and absolute monarchies, average citizens have the least political power, as decision-making is concentrated in the hands of a single leader or a small elite group. In these systems, political dissent is often suppressed, and citizens have minimal opportunities to influence governance or policy. Similarly, in oligarchies, where a few individuals or families hold significant power, the general populace is largely excluded from meaningful political participation.
The Enlightenment emphasized ideas such as individual rights, freedom, and the social contract between citizens and government. These principles influenced changes in the relationship between citizens and their government by promoting the idea of citizen participation in government decision-making, the separation of powers, and the limitation of governmental authority through constitutional means. The Enlightenment also inspired movements for democracy and human rights, leading to the overthrow of absolute monarchies in favor of more representative forms of government.
The purpose of monarchs varies by country and can include serving as a symbolic figurehead, representing national unity and continuity, and embodying cultural traditions. In constitutional monarchies, their role is largely ceremonial, with real political power resting in elected officials. In absolute monarchies, they may wield significant authority over governance and decision-making. Overall, monarchs often play a role in fostering national identity and stability.
The citizens of a the country can influence decision making
A country ruled by an assembly of citizens rather than a king is often referred to as a republic or a democracy. In these systems, power is vested in elected representatives or directly in the hands of the people, allowing for collective decision-making. This contrasts with monarchies, where a single ruler holds power. Examples of such countries include the United States and France.
No. Some kingdoms have high standards of living and freedoms for their citizens. Some "people's democratic republics" are tyrannies. The decision should be based on something other than name of the government.
Dictatorships and monarchies are considered autocratic political systems because power is concentrated in the hands of a single ruler or a small group, limiting political pluralism and dissent. In dictatorships, leaders often maintain control through coercion and repression, while in monarchies, authority is typically inherited and can be absolute, with few checks on the ruler's power. Both systems restrict individual freedoms and democratic participation, undermining the principles of representative governance. As a result, decision-making is centralized, often prioritizing the interests of the ruling elite over the general populace.
The dred scott decision
plebiscite, decision of the majority of citizens
In ancient Greece, the government was a complex system of city-states where citizens had the right to participate in decision-making. The most well-known form of government in Greece was democracy, where eligible citizens could vote on issues and hold public office. Some city-states also had monarchies, where power was held by a single ruler, or oligarchies, where power was held by a small group of wealthy individuals.