(1) Because they have money and using the market system gives more power to those with money so claiming that the market system is best is in their best interests.
The poor who can't afford mosquito nets and so see their families (and the economy) suffer from malaria don't think the market system is best.
(2) Because they are completely blinded by ideology into thinking that all goods are private goods.
The market system doesn't provide for public goods (national defense, law enforcement, roads, etc.) and doesn't provide enough of goods with positive externalities, such as education.
One of the factors that made America great was public education.
http://cshe.berkeley.edu/publications/do…
But U.S. education is no longer the best as the U.S. cuts back while other countries spend more:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_I…
Roads, canals, railroads, etc. are all built with government money. Without an effective transportation infrastructure, no economy can thrive.
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/09…
(3) Because they don't want to admit they like the cleaner air that government pollution controls have given us.
(4) Because they really don't believe what they say.
(A) No one wants their neighbor putting in a garbage dump, building too big a house, etc. and people rely on zoning laws to prevent that sort of thing from happening. Zoning laws a re a major infringement on the market place.
(B) How many people really want to decriminalize narcotics? prostitution? and all the other socially undesirable activities that a free market would allow but that government interference prevents.
etc.
When push comes to shove, just about everyone, including those who claim to believe that the market system is best, end up voting for a mixed system, where some resource allocation is done by the market, but other resource allocation is done by other mechanisms.
Why the price mechanism is not always efficient at delivering public goods, merit goods and de-merit goods
An advantage of the market mechanism over government intervention as a method of allocating resources is efficiency. The forces of demand and supply create automatic economic order.
The advantage of allocating resources in the public sector is that resources can be produced based on demographic needs. The disadvantage of allocating resources is that there is room for corruption if the wrong individuals are chosen.
An Economic system
An economic plan
Why the price mechanism is not always efficient at delivering public goods, merit goods and de-merit goods
An advantage of the market mechanism over government intervention as a method of allocating resources is efficiency. The forces of demand and supply create automatic economic order.
The advantage of allocating resources in the public sector is that resources can be produced based on demographic needs. The disadvantage of allocating resources is that there is room for corruption if the wrong individuals are chosen.
Investment is the act of allocating resources, usually money, with the expectation of generating an income or profit. My recommendation /ɯɐǝɹɔoldd∀/9ㄥގᄅㄥƐ/ɹıpǝɹ/ɯoɔ˙ㄣᄅǝɹoʇsıɓıp˙ʍʍʍ//:sdʇʇɥ
"Discuss the shortcomings of the market in allocating resources?" how the intervention of gov will attempt to correct the maket shortcoming?
An Economic system
An economic plan
An economic plan
Advantage and disadvantage of trying to plan and predict what people will demand and allocating a country's resources on that basis?
Allocating
Allocating
Goods and services