they have different value judgment
Economists often give conflicting advice to policy makers for two basic reasons: 1) economists may disagree about the validity of alternative positive theories about how the world works and/or 2) economists may have different values and therefore different normative views about what policy should try to accomplish
Economics aims to be a positive science since, by definition, science is a positive enterprise. Normative evaluation necessarily implies valuation of specific types of outcomes over others, which would invalidate typical economic analysis by defending theory by using philosophy, especially ethics, instead of mathematics, statistics, and logic. While normative evaluation is important in the application of economics, especially in the field of social welfare, it is considered taboo by economists to establish economic theory, rationally or empirically, on normative science.
Because most of them still haven't worked out just what makes an economy tick, and most of them get paid well for pretending that they do.
Normative issues are special editions put out by some magazines and periodicals which use very minimalist layout and formatting. This is mainly used as a marketing ploy, since it makes the issue stand out against other magazines it may be displayed with. Although common elsewhere, it is shunned by most non-profit groups, who consider it a gimmick.
Normative theory provides the collection of financial information.
Economists often give conflicting advice to policy makers for two basic reasons: 1) economists may disagree about the validity of alternative positive theories about how the world works and/or 2) economists may have different values and therefore different normative views about what policy should try to accomplish
I disagree with my dad because we have different perspectives or opinions on certain issues or topics.
copyrite
None
Economics aims to be a positive science since, by definition, science is a positive enterprise. Normative evaluation necessarily implies valuation of specific types of outcomes over others, which would invalidate typical economic analysis by defending theory by using philosophy, especially ethics, instead of mathematics, statistics, and logic. While normative evaluation is important in the application of economics, especially in the field of social welfare, it is considered taboo by economists to establish economic theory, rationally or empirically, on normative science.
Because most of them still haven't worked out just what makes an economy tick, and most of them get paid well for pretending that they do.
economic theory can guide the economists to solve macroeconomic issues such as inflation, unemployment, deflationary and inflationary gaps, budget deficits etc.
Normative issues are special editions put out by some magazines and periodicals which use very minimalist layout and formatting. This is mainly used as a marketing ploy, since it makes the issue stand out against other magazines it may be displayed with. Although common elsewhere, it is shunned by most non-profit groups, who consider it a gimmick.
gay marriage ,abortions ,ext.
LEONARD M. HAMMER has written: 'FOUCAULDIAN APPROACH TO INTERNATIONAL LAW: DESCRIPTIVE THOUGHTS FOR NORMATIVE ISSUES'
Normative theory provides the collection of financial information.
Educational planning consists of the normative, strategic and operational stages. The normative stage is the one in which policies are developed and formed.