no
no
Points For:Those who do not find art education appealing will not use it in future, hence, it will be a waste of time which could have been used for other subjects.Art is something that people look at and relax, but it doesn't help others in their working life. Therefore doing art, or teaching art, is a waste of time as it does not help others in their lives.Art education does not teach us anything that helps us in life. So teaching something that does not help us in life is a total waste of time as the time can be used for other things.it wastes useful resources such as paint and cardboardnot everyone can be good in artPoints Against:art is a form of expressionart can be taught so that children may grow up to be artists and earn moneystudents should learn how to appreciate the different forms of artit can be used as a form of relaxation from stressful studyingit can be used to beautify the surroundings
The Renaissance
A waste of time.
they want to waste as much of your time as possible
no, it isnt its a waste of time, says the scientest of Philippines
The Renaissance
To become an art teacher, usually you’ll need a degree in art/fine arts or art education (sometimes combined with education/pedagogy courses), a training programme in teaching, and often a certification/licensure depending on your region. You’ll also need a solid art portfolio and ongoing training. If you want structured, faster preparation, Penkraft’s Teachers’ Training offers certification and subject-wise training to help with many of these requirements. penkraft.in/TeachersTraining
what education need to have a teachers art
At this time there was very little education to speak of. Vikings were warriors and did not waste their time with petty things like school.
It was art he loved art
art education.