policies that give preference to minorities discriminate against nonminorities
Critics often make the argument that affirmative action is unconstitutional.
Affirmative action has been controversial for a number of reasons. Arguably the most common argument used by those who oppose affirmative action programs is that it results in "reverse discrimination", meaning discrimination against white people (primarily white men). BalancedPolitics.org does a great job of answering your question in depth at the Related Link below.
An argument against affirmative action is that it can lead to reverse discrimination, where individuals from historically advantaged groups may be unfairly overlooked in favor of less qualified candidates solely based on their race or gender. Critics argue that this approach undermines the principle of meritocracy by prioritizing demographic characteristics over individual achievements and qualifications. Additionally, it may foster resentment and division rather than promoting genuine equality and social cohesion.
There is a very clear, utilitarian argument that supports Affirmative Action. The ends of establishing parity by numbers, assuring minority talent in the professions, and enhancing upward mobility in a minority group, outweighs the means of giving women and racial minorities and extra boost in a competition against other candidates.
It would violate the goal of creating a colorblind society.
Affirmative action is about farming
what employer are subject to affirmative action
No affirmative action is morally defensible.
Chinese for Affirmative Action was created in 1969.
reverse discrimination
Affirmative action
Affirmative Action