The full question with choices was:
Which of the following would you be looking for as a critical reader with an eye toward ethos in an op-ed piece?
A) The writer's use of emotion to attempt to persuade the reader
B) The argument the writer makes and the strength of that argument
C) Any potential bias the writer may have and the level of knowledge or expertise the writer may have on the topic
D) None of the above.
The answer would be: C) Any potential bias the writer may have and the level of knowledge or expertise the writer may have on the topic
Ethos... = Writer or persona. You are looking for bias toward the subject. That's the writer.
Any potential bias the writer may have and the level of knowledge or expertise the writer may have on the topic
A. potential bias. B. level of knowledge. C. use of persuasive writing tools. D. All of the above
A critical reader with an eye toward logos would be looking for any potential bias the writer might have as well his or her level of knowledge on the subject.
You would want to look for the writer's use of credible sources, well-reasoned arguments, and balanced perspective. Bias can be identified through the writer's tone, language, selective use of evidence, or presence of conflicting interests. Assessing the writer's level of expertise involves examining their qualifications, previous experience with the topic, and consistency in presenting accurate information.
I am looking for a man of experience with expertise in these matters.
critical reading
A critical reader of an op-ed piece who is looking for pathos is trying to find emotional appeals.
A critical reader of an op-ed piece who is looking for pathos is trying to find emotional appeals.
Individuals who have completed a PhD and wish to further their expertise in a specific field can pursue a postdoctoral research position, attend specialized workshops or conferences, collaborate with experts in their field, or enroll in a specialized master's degree program to deepen their knowledge and skills.
When we study the motive of a primary source's writer, we're looking into issues of potential:
Critical analysis involves evaluating information or situations by looking at them from multiple perspectives, identifying underlying assumptions, questioning underlying logic, and considering potential biases. It also involves examining evidence, drawing conclusions based on evidence, and forming a reasoned judgment or evaluation. Critical analysis often requires thinking independently and considering the broader implications of the subject matter being analyzed.
When we study the motive of a primary source's writer, we're looking into issues of potential: