answersLogoWhite

0

If you agree to take on that responsibility of making decisions then you must be prepared to accept any outcome. The difficulties are endless, but tough love seems to be where most fail. Any good parent can tell you about "sitting the bench" which means letting the chips fall where they may and hope that there will be enough pieces to put it all back together. It's hard make dicisions that affect the things and people we hold dear, but it's the responsibility of doing what's right that makes us a good leader.

User Avatar

Wiki User

17y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Educational Theory

Is rational decision making different from decision making?

Rational decision making is a type of decision making that involves a systematic process of evaluating options based on logic and facts to achieve the best outcome. Decision making, on the other hand, is a broader term that encompasses all processes involved in choosing between different alternatives, which may or may not always be rational.


How would one compare certainty decision making and uncertainty decision making?

I am not so sure how you would compare certainty decision making and uncertainty decision making, but there is a great site that focuses on interactive, critcial thinking dialogue offering practical insights and effective tools for findind the cause of problems, creating innovative solutions, making decisions, and anticipating problems before they happen. Visit http://blog.actionm.com/ for more information.


What are the pros and cons of the classical decision making model?

One pro of the classical decision-making model is its logical and structured approach, helping to ensure thorough consideration of options. However, a con is its assumption of perfect information and rationality, which may not always reflect real-world complexities and limitations in decision-making.


Discuss rational decision making model with example?

A rational decision making model provides a structured and sequenced approach to decision making. Using such an approach can help to ensure discipline and consistency is built into your decision making process.As the word rational suggests, this approach brings logic and order to decision making. Our rational decision making model consists of a series of steps, beginning with problem/opportunity identification, and ending with actions to be taken on decisions made. A General Rational Decision Making Model Rational decision making processes consist of a sequence of steps designed to rationally develop a desired solution.Typically these steps involve:Identifying a problem or opportunityThe first step is to recognise a problem or to see opportunities that may be worthwhile. A rational decision making model is best employed where relatively complex decisions have to be made. The first decision making lesson should be to ask youself if you really have a problem to solve or a decision to make. Gathering informationWhat is relevant and what is not relevant to the decision? What do you need to know before you can make a decision, or that will help you make the right one?Analyzing the situationWhat alternative courses of action may be available to you? What different interpretations of the data may be possible? Developing optionsGenerate several possible options. Be creative and positive.Evaluating alternativesWhat criteria should you use to evaluate? Evaluate for feasibility, acceptability and desirability. Which alternative will best achieve your objectives?Selecting a preferred alternativeExplore the provisional preferred alternative for future possible adverse consequences. What problems might it create? What are the risks of making this decision?Acting on the decisionPut a plan in place to implement the decision. Have you allocated resources to implement? Is the decision accepted and supported by colleagues? Are they commited to to making the decision work?. Strengths and Weaknesses of the Rational Decision Making Model The main strength of a rational decision making model is that it provides structure and discipline to the decision making process. It helps ensure we consider the full range of factors relating to a decision, in a logical and comprehensive manner.However, we should always remember that whilst the model indicates what needs to be done, it's often how things are done that characterizes effective decision making.Research illustrates that bad decisions were usually bad because two things were missing: adequate participation of stakeholders in the decision making process; sufficient time spent generating a range of possible solutions.


What is the method recommended for teaching decision making skills?

One recommended method for teaching decision-making skills is through experiential learning, where individuals practice making decisions in real or simulated scenarios and receive feedback on their choices. This hands-on approach allows learners to understand the consequences of their decisions and develop critical thinking skills. Additionally, incorporating case studies, role-playing exercises, and group discussions can enhance the learning experience and help individuals apply decision-making principles in various contexts.

Related Questions

What are some examples of participative arrangements?

Some examples of participative arrangements include team decision-making, employee involvement in goal setting, suggestion programs, and participative management where employees are involved in decision-making processes.


What are the disadvanteges of participative management style?

The answer depends on how is participative management defined, I assume you mean the style where decision-making is more inclusive and leaders/managers incorporate employees' thoughts, ideas and contributions into overall decision. Here are some disadvantages to keep in mind: 1. Decision-making process can be very slow. This of course depends on what form of participative management is being practiced; if everything requires consensus or majority, speed of decision can be huge problem, and sometimes decisions will not be made at all. 2. It is easy for leaders to abdicate their responsibility in this model because participative management can easily degenerate into decision-by-committe. 3. Decisions can be sub-optimal in many cases if the focus is on remaining participative (and inclusive) and not on making right decision. Here is a good link on this: Participative


Which are trends in Participative management?

The trends in participative management allows even the subordinates to contribute to the process of decision making. This has proved to be very efficient but requires some level of control.


Participative leadership style?

Participative leadership style is one that will involve the subjects being led in decision making. For instance, in a company a manager will engage employees to contribute to a particular issue and give suggestions.


What does participative arrangements mean?

Participative arrangements refer to the involvement of employees or stakeholders in decision-making processes within an organization. This approach aims to encourage shared responsibility, input, and collaboration to improve overall decision quality and foster a sense of ownership and commitment among participants.


What is Vroom and Jago's decision making style when is influenced by subordinates?

Vroom and Jago's decision-making style when influenced by subordinates is known as "participative" or "consultative." This style involves leaders seeking input and feedback from their team members before making a final decision. It values collaboration, input, and buy-in from employees in the decision-making process.


What is the difference between democratic - participative leadership style and task oriented?

A democratic or participative leadership style shares the burden of decision making with others. A task oriented leadership style focuses on set goals and is usually used when meeting deadlines. Little consideration is given for the group in this leadership style.


What is participant?

Participative means more than one person participating in something. This term is often used in management. It means that all team leaders participate in decision making.


Section of the brain that makes decisions?

The prefrontal cortex is the section of the brain responsible for making decisions. It is involved in complex cognitive behavior, decision making, and moderating social behavior. Damage to this area can lead to difficulties in decision-making and impulse control.


What is the role of HR manager in participative management?

The role of a HR manager in participative management is to engage the other subordinate employees in making managerial decisions. This is considered to be an effective form of management that enhances teamwork.


What are the types of prison supervision styles?

The main types of prison supervision styles include authoritarian, hands-off, and participative. Authoritarian supervision is characterized by strict rules and control, while hands-off supervision involves a more lenient approach with minimal intervention. Participative supervision encourages inmate involvement in decision-making and problem-solving within the prison environment.


Who is an example of having a participative leadership style?

An example of a leader with a participative leadership style is Google co-founder Larry Page. He encouraged open communication and collaboration among employees, fostering an environment where team members could contribute ideas and participate in decision-making processes. This approach not only empowered employees but also led to innovative solutions and a strong company culture.