Yes, the hidden curriculum can be viewed through the conflict perspective as it highlights the ways in which schools perpetuate and reproduce social inequalities by teaching implicit norms, values, and behaviors that reflect dominant societal norms and promote the interests of the ruling class.
Perspective curriculum focuses on the theories or philosophical beliefs that underpin educational practices, whereas descriptive curriculum provides detailed information on what topics, concepts, and skills are to be taught in a course or program. Perspective curriculum aims to shape educational goals and practices based on certain ideologies, while descriptive curriculum outlines the specific content and tasks that students will engage with during their learning.
The conflict perspective of race and ethnicity views society as divided by power imbalances and unequal distribution of resources based on racial and ethnic categories. It emphasizes how these divisions lead to competition, discrimination, and oppression among different racial and ethnic groups. Conflict theorists argue that race and ethnicity are social constructs used to maintain the status quo and perpetuate inequality.
Oh, honey, the hidden curriculum is like the secret sauce of education. It's all those sneaky lessons students pick up outside of the official curriculum, like social norms, behaviors, and attitudes. Basically, it's the stuff they don't teach you in textbooks but you better believe it's shaping you whether you like it or not.
A school-based evaluation of a curriculum allows for real-world testing and feedback from teachers and students who are directly using the curriculum. It provides insights into how the curriculum is working in the specific context of the school, allowing for adaptations and improvements to be made based on practical experience. Additionally, it promotes teacher buy-in and ownership of the curriculum, leading to more effective implementation.
Hidden curriculum, in the most general terms, can be defined as "some of the outcomes or by-products of schools or of non-school settings, particularly those states which are learned but not openly intended."[1] However, a variety of definitions have been developed based on the broad range of perspectives of those who study this phenomenon. Any setting, including traditionally recreational and social activities, may teach unintended lessons since it is tied not necessarily to schools but rather to learning experiences.[2] But most often, hidden curriculum refers to various types of knowledge gained in primary and secondary school settings, usually with a negative connotation referring to inequalities suffered as a result of its presence. This attitude stems from the commitment of the school system of the United States to promote democracy and ensure equal intellectual development, goals that are hindered by these intangible lessons [3]. In this context, hidden curriculum is said to reinforce existing social inequalities by educating students in various matters and behaviors according to their class and social status. In the same way that there is an unequal distribution of cultural capital in this society, there is a corresponding distribution of knowledge amongst its students.[4] The hidden curriculum can also refer to the transmission of norms, values, and beliefs conveyed in both the formal educational content and the social interactions within these schools.[5] Hidden curriculum is difficult to explicitly define because it varies among its students and their experiences and because is it constantly changing as the knowledge and beliefs of a society evolve.The concept that the hidden curriculum expresses is the idea that schools do more than simply transmit knowledge, as laid down in the official curricula. Behind it lies criticism of the social implications, political underpinnings, and cultural outcomes of modern educative activities. While early examinations were concerned with identifying the anti-democratic nature of schooling, later studies have taken various tones, including those concerned with socialism, capitalism, and anarchism in education.
Perspective curriculum focuses on the theories or philosophical beliefs that underpin educational practices, whereas descriptive curriculum provides detailed information on what topics, concepts, and skills are to be taught in a course or program. Perspective curriculum aims to shape educational goals and practices based on certain ideologies, while descriptive curriculum outlines the specific content and tasks that students will engage with during their learning.
A curriculum based on what students are supposed to know from previous classes.
Math, history, English are all subjects based curriculum.
It is curriculum organizednin the traditional way by indivdual subjects
The conflict perspective of race and ethnicity views society as divided by power imbalances and unequal distribution of resources based on racial and ethnic categories. It emphasizes how these divisions lead to competition, discrimination, and oppression among different racial and ethnic groups. Conflict theorists argue that race and ethnicity are social constructs used to maintain the status quo and perpetuate inequality.
Be cause the models of curriculum help to know the types of curriculum based on the level of learners to whom the curriculum is developed for.
Oh, honey, the hidden curriculum is like the secret sauce of education. It's all those sneaky lessons students pick up outside of the official curriculum, like social norms, behaviors, and attitudes. Basically, it's the stuff they don't teach you in textbooks but you better believe it's shaping you whether you like it or not.
Dimensions of curriculum development includes planning units for each curriculum. Lessons for each unit are based on goals and objectives.
The conflict perspective, rooted in the ideas of Karl Marx, would be most likely to argue that the social order is based on coercion and exploitation. This perspective focuses on the struggle for power and resources between different groups in society, with the dominant group maintaining control through coercion and exploitation of subordinate groups.
A school-based evaluation of a curriculum allows for real-world testing and feedback from teachers and students who are directly using the curriculum. It provides insights into how the curriculum is working in the specific context of the school, allowing for adaptations and improvements to be made based on practical experience. Additionally, it promotes teacher buy-in and ownership of the curriculum, leading to more effective implementation.
They were based on Roman curriculum ~for e2020 based on Roman schools.
The major types of conflict based on the substance of the conflict are interpersonal conflict, intrapersonal conflict, intragroup conflict, intergroup conflict, and organizational conflict. These types differ in terms of the parties involved and the nature of the conflict.