Human cloning is a controversial venture and it is unlikely that it will ever be totally accepted in society.
If humans were cloned, most people would probably agree that they should be treated the same as any other human. Afterall, they can't control the way they are born, just like you or me cannot control our skin color or gender.
However, I have discussed the topic with different Demographics of people to find some mixed responses. Some in the religious community say they would not let a clone into their house of worship since their god did not create them. Others say that they should be viewed as property.
However, since the world of human cloning seems to be a far off prospect now, this question will probably remain open for discussion.
I have more to add to the section above, i believe that the people with religion, are wrong, because, since god created you, and you make the clone, then therefore, god made the clone.
This is a ridiculous question. Why wouldn't they have rights and why wouldn't they have the same rights as everyone else? Just because the human didn't come from sex doesn't mean they are not human. Anyone who disagrees is superstitious and unintelligent. This will be the next form of slavery/racism. Even dogs have rights. A human is a human.
There are no federal laws completely banning human cloning in the United States. There are regulations against using federal funds for cloning research. A United Nations declaration was adopted, calling for the worldwide ban of human cloning.
The controversy surrounding human cloning is an ethical issue. People wonder if humans have the right to create other humans and if humans do have that right, do they also have the right to take life away? The controversy is over life and death and who has the power to control them.
No human has yet been cloned. With the exception of identical twins.
thee down falls of cloning are the dark parts of a clone....a clone of a dog or human may be bad...misfitted...or mis-shaped
Natural Law Theory
There is currently no technology that can clone a full human being. While some progress has been made with cloning animals, the ethical and moral concerns surrounding human cloning have prevented it from being pursued. Additionally, cloning a specific historical figure like Thomas Edison raises significant ethical, legal, and scientific challenges.
As far as is known no human cloning has taken place. Yet.
Cloning humans raises ethical concerns, as it may infringe on individual rights, lead to devaluation of human life, and pose risks to the health and well-being of the cloned individuals. Additionally, there are unresolved safety and technical issues surrounding human cloning that could have unknown consequences.
In Australia, it is illegal to clone a human being. It is also illegal to clone a human being in the United States.
There have been many attempts to clone a human being but all have failed. No, there has not been a human clone created till this day.
not yet
Human nature ethics is a form of ethical theory that relies on examining human nature in order to come to ethical conclusions. Often human nature ethical theorists base their ethics on biological drives.
You can clone most organic compounds. So yes you can clone chickens. It has been done with cows, and certain parts of the human anatomy.
No scientist haven't yet cloned a human
Human Beings
mack truwilligar from Germany
A clone means a genetically identical copy of an organism, so can be any living thing potentially.