0
Interpreters translate source code into machine while it is executing. The machine code is not saved, thus the code must be translated on every execution. As a result, the code is larger and very much slower than an equivalent machine code executable would be. However, the source code is highly portable.
Compilers translate the whole program at once to produce a machine code executable that requires no further translation. However, the machine code is non-portable and must be recompiled for each supported platform.
Some language compile to byte code rather than machine code. Byte code is best thought of as being the native language of a virtual machine rather than a physical one. The virtual machine then interprets the byte code to produce the machine code. Like all interpreted languages, the byte code is highly portable, and while quicker to interpret than source code, is still very much larger and slower than compiled native machine code.
What else can I help you with?
Which type of translater is used by GW BASIC either compiler or interpreter?
its an interpreter
How compiler differ form interpreter?
because the compiler convert whole of the sentence once into the machine langauge but the interpreter convert one by one
Which produces faster program execution a compiler or pure interpreter?
A compiled program would execute faster than an interpreter running the same code step by step.
Compiler and interpreter belongs to which category of software?
Both are "System Softwares".
How can a called function determine the number of arguments that have been passed to it?
It is not the function but the compiler or interpreter which interprets the code. When the program is compiled and run the compiler checks the entire code line by line to check which function is called. If you encounter polymorphism in other Object Oriented Languages it would be more clear how a function with same name and different arguments are called.
How many model of compiler?
combination of interpreter and compiler.
Which type of translater is used by GW BASIC either compiler or interpreter?
its an interpreter
How compiler differ form interpreter?
because the compiler convert whole of the sentence once into the machine langauge but the interpreter convert one by one
Which produces faster program execution a compiler or pure interpreter?
A compiled program would execute faster than an interpreter running the same code step by step.
Why does compiler better than interpreter?
There is no point in comparison.
Is there used compiler or interpreter in HTM?
A htm file is interpreted, not compiled. A browser acts as the interpreter.
Which is the host language uses to develop Compiler or interpreter?
You will have to ask the compiler and interpreter writers that question. What I can tell you with certainty, at one time all programs were hand assembled.
Who will take more memory space compiler or interpreter?
Interpreters
Examples of computer language translators?
Assembler Interpreter Compiler
What compiler and interpreter effect the speed of computer?
need to get to mars
Who takes more memory space interpreter or compiler?
Interpreters
What is compilers and interpreters the purpose?
compiler and interpreter used to convert high level language to machine level language .....compiler does dis job in atonce while interpreter does in step by step
