0
What else can I help you with?
How do you use an interface?
When you implement an interface, you're agreeing to adhere to the contract defined in the interface. That means you're agreeing to provide legal implementations for every method defined in the interface, and that anyone who knows what the interface methods look like can rest assured that they can invoke those methods on an instance of your implementing class. (Thy need not bother much about how you have implemented it. All they bother about is whether a method of the name mentioned in the interface is available or not) Now, you might stop me and ask, what if I implement an interface and opt not to write code for a method that I am supposed to? The answer is simple. The compiler wouldn't let you do that. You cannot successfully implement an interface without providing method implementation for all the methods declared inside the interface. This is how the java system ensures that when someone knows a certain method name in an interface and has an instance of a class that implements it, can actually call that method without fear that the method isn't implemented inside the class. Assuming an interface, Convertible, with two methods: openHood(), and setOpenHoodFactor(), the following class will compile: public class Ball implements Convertible { // Keyword 'implements' public void openHood() { } public void setOpenHoodFactor(int bf) { } } Ok, I know what you are thinking now. "This has got to be the worst implementation class that you have seen". Though it compiles and runs as well, it is actually doing nothing… the interface contract guarantees that the class implementing it will have a method of a particular name but it never guaranteed a good implementation. In other words, the compiler does not bother whether you have code inside your method or not. All it cares is if you have methods of the matching names as in the interface. That's all… Implementation classes must adhere to the same rules for method implementation as a class extending an abstract class. In order to be a legal implementation class, a nonabstract implementation class must do the following: • Provide concrete (nonabstract) implementations for all methods from the declared interface. • Follow all the rules for legal overrides. • Declare no checked exceptions on implementation methods other than those declared by the interface method, or subclasses of those declared by the interface method. • Maintain the signature of the interface method, and maintain the same return type (or a subtype). • It does not have to declare the exceptions declared in the interface method declaration
Why use interfaces in Java?
an Interface is nothing but a contract as to how a class should behave. It just declares the behavior as empty methods and the implementing class actually writes the code that will determine the behavior. When you implement an interface, you're agreeing to adhere to the contract defined in the interface. That means you're agreeing to provide legal implementations for every method defined in the interface, and that anyone who knows what the interface methods look like can rest assured that they can invoke those methods on an instance of your implementing class. (Thy need not bother much about how you have implemented it. All they bother about is whether a method of the name mentioned in the interface is available or not) Now, you might stop me and ask, what if I implement an interface and opt not to write code for a method that I am supposed to? The answer is simple. The compiler wouldn't let you do that. You cannot successfully implement an interface without providing method implementation for all the methods declared inside the interface. This is how the java system ensures that when someone knows a certain method name in an interface and has an instance of a class that implements it, can actually call that method without fear that the method isnt implemented inside the class. Assuming an interface, Convertible, with two methods: openHood(), and setOpenHoodFactor(), the following class will compile: public class Ball implements Convertible { // Keyword 'implements' public void openHood() { } public void setOpenHoodFactor(int bf) { } } Ok, I know what you are thinking now. "This has got to be the worst implementation class that you have seen". Though it compiles and runs as well, it is actually doing nothing… the interface contract guarantees that the class implementing it will have a method of a particular name but it never guaranteed a good implementation. In other words, the compiler does not bother whether you have code inside your method or not. All it cares is if you have methods of the matching names as in the interface. That's all… Implementation classes must adhere to the same rules for method implementation as a class extending an abstract class. In order to be a legal implementation class, a nonabstract implementation class must do the following: • Provide concrete (nonabstract) implementations for all methods from the declared interface. • Follow all the rules for legal overrides. • Declare no checked exceptions on implementation methods other than those declared by the interface method, or subclasses of those declared by the interface method. • Maintain the signature of the interface method, and maintain the same return type (or a subtype). • It does not have to declare the exceptions declared in the interface method declaration
What is a predefined interface in java?
An interface is a collection of methods that must be implemented by the implementing class.An interface defines a contract regarding what a class must do, without saying anything about how the class will do it.Interface can contain declaration of methods and variables.implementing class must define all the methods declared in the interfaceIf a class implements an interface and does not implement all the methods then class itself must be declared as abstractVariables in interface automatically become static and final variableof the implementing classMembers of interface are implicitly public, so need not be declared as public.An interface must be implemented in class.
If you enter same function name into two interfaces than how you implement these two into one class?
If you have two (or more) interfaces with the same method definition like this: public interface one(){ public int doSomething(); } public int interface two(){ public doSomething(); } You can implement both in the same class: public class myClass implements one, two{ public int doSomething(){ // the code to do something goes here return 0; } } And you only have to write the implimentation once. This code is valid for all the interfaces implemented with a doSomething() method.
Abstract class vs interface?
Comparison between an Abstract Class and an Interface:While an abstract class can define both abstract and non-abstract methods, an interface can have only abstract methods. Another way interfaces differ from abstract classes is that interfaces have very little flexibility in how the methods and variables defined in the interface are declared. These rules are strict:
How do you use an interface?
When you implement an interface, you're agreeing to adhere to the contract defined in the interface. That means you're agreeing to provide legal implementations for every method defined in the interface, and that anyone who knows what the interface methods look like can rest assured that they can invoke those methods on an instance of your implementing class. (Thy need not bother much about how you have implemented it. All they bother about is whether a method of the name mentioned in the interface is available or not) Now, you might stop me and ask, what if I implement an interface and opt not to write code for a method that I am supposed to? The answer is simple. The compiler wouldn't let you do that. You cannot successfully implement an interface without providing method implementation for all the methods declared inside the interface. This is how the java system ensures that when someone knows a certain method name in an interface and has an instance of a class that implements it, can actually call that method without fear that the method isn't implemented inside the class. Assuming an interface, Convertible, with two methods: openHood(), and setOpenHoodFactor(), the following class will compile: public class Ball implements Convertible { // Keyword 'implements' public void openHood() { } public void setOpenHoodFactor(int bf) { } } Ok, I know what you are thinking now. "This has got to be the worst implementation class that you have seen". Though it compiles and runs as well, it is actually doing nothing… the interface contract guarantees that the class implementing it will have a method of a particular name but it never guaranteed a good implementation. In other words, the compiler does not bother whether you have code inside your method or not. All it cares is if you have methods of the matching names as in the interface. That's all… Implementation classes must adhere to the same rules for method implementation as a class extending an abstract class. In order to be a legal implementation class, a nonabstract implementation class must do the following: • Provide concrete (nonabstract) implementations for all methods from the declared interface. • Follow all the rules for legal overrides. • Declare no checked exceptions on implementation methods other than those declared by the interface method, or subclasses of those declared by the interface method. • Maintain the signature of the interface method, and maintain the same return type (or a subtype). • It does not have to declare the exceptions declared in the interface method declaration
What is an interface and how will you go about implementing an interface?
an Interface is nothing but a contract as to how a class should behave. It just declares the behavior as empty methods and the implementing class actually writes the code that will determine the behavior. When you implement an interface, you're agreeing to adhere to the contract defined in the interface. That means you're agreeing to provide legal implementations for every method defined in the interface, and that anyone who knows what the interface methods look like can rest assured that they can invoke those methods on an instance of your implementing class. (Thy need not bother much about how you have implemented it. All they bother about is whether a method of the name mentioned in the interface is available or not) Now, you might stop me and ask, what if I implement an interface and opt not to write code for a method that I am supposed to? The answer is simple. The compiler wouldn't let you do that. You cannot successfully implement an interface without providing method implementation for all the methods declared inside the interface. This is how the java system ensures that when someone knows a certain method name in an interface and has an instance of a class that implements it, can actually call that method without fear that the method isn't implemented inside the class. Assuming an interface, Convertible, with two methods: openHood(), and setOpenHoodFactor(), the following class will compile: public class Ball implements Convertible { // Keyword 'implements' public void openHood() { } public void setOpenHoodFactor(int bf) { } } Ok, I know what you are thinking now. "This has got to be the worst implementation class that you have seen". Though it compiles and runs as well, it is actually doing nothing… the interface contract guarantees that the class implementing it will have a method of a particular name but it never guaranteed a good implementation. In other words, the compiler does not bother whether you have code inside your method or not. All it cares is if you have methods of the matching names as in the interface. That's all… Implementation classes must adhere to the same rules for method implementation as a class extending an abstract class. In order to be a legal implementation class, a nonabstract implementation class must do the following: • Provide concrete (nonabstract) implementations for all methods from the declared interface. • Follow all the rules for legal overrides. • Declare no checked exceptions on implementation methods other than those declared by the interface method, or subclasses of those declared by the interface method. • Maintain the signature of the interface method, and maintain the same return type (or a subtype). • It does not have to declare the exceptions declared in the interface method declaration.
Why use interfaces in Java?
an Interface is nothing but a contract as to how a class should behave. It just declares the behavior as empty methods and the implementing class actually writes the code that will determine the behavior. When you implement an interface, you're agreeing to adhere to the contract defined in the interface. That means you're agreeing to provide legal implementations for every method defined in the interface, and that anyone who knows what the interface methods look like can rest assured that they can invoke those methods on an instance of your implementing class. (Thy need not bother much about how you have implemented it. All they bother about is whether a method of the name mentioned in the interface is available or not) Now, you might stop me and ask, what if I implement an interface and opt not to write code for a method that I am supposed to? The answer is simple. The compiler wouldn't let you do that. You cannot successfully implement an interface without providing method implementation for all the methods declared inside the interface. This is how the java system ensures that when someone knows a certain method name in an interface and has an instance of a class that implements it, can actually call that method without fear that the method isnt implemented inside the class. Assuming an interface, Convertible, with two methods: openHood(), and setOpenHoodFactor(), the following class will compile: public class Ball implements Convertible { // Keyword 'implements' public void openHood() { } public void setOpenHoodFactor(int bf) { } } Ok, I know what you are thinking now. "This has got to be the worst implementation class that you have seen". Though it compiles and runs as well, it is actually doing nothing… the interface contract guarantees that the class implementing it will have a method of a particular name but it never guaranteed a good implementation. In other words, the compiler does not bother whether you have code inside your method or not. All it cares is if you have methods of the matching names as in the interface. That's all… Implementation classes must adhere to the same rules for method implementation as a class extending an abstract class. In order to be a legal implementation class, a nonabstract implementation class must do the following: • Provide concrete (nonabstract) implementations for all methods from the declared interface. • Follow all the rules for legal overrides. • Declare no checked exceptions on implementation methods other than those declared by the interface method, or subclasses of those declared by the interface method. • Maintain the signature of the interface method, and maintain the same return type (or a subtype). • It does not have to declare the exceptions declared in the interface method declaration
Interface method have by default method public?
Yes, Interface mehtods are public by default so that they could be implemented by every class implementing the interfaces.
If you enter same function name into two interfaces than how you implement these two into one class?
If you have two (or more) interfaces with the same method definition like this: public interface one(){ public int doSomething(); } public int interface two(){ public doSomething(); } You can implement both in the same class: public class myClass implements one, two{ public int doSomething(){ // the code to do something goes here return 0; } } And you only have to write the implimentation once. This code is valid for all the interfaces implemented with a doSomething() method.
What is a predefined interface in java?
An interface is a collection of methods that must be implemented by the implementing class.An interface defines a contract regarding what a class must do, without saying anything about how the class will do it.Interface can contain declaration of methods and variables.implementing class must define all the methods declared in the interfaceIf a class implements an interface and does not implement all the methods then class itself must be declared as abstractVariables in interface automatically become static and final variableof the implementing classMembers of interface are implicitly public, so need not be declared as public.An interface must be implemented in class.
What is difference between interface and abstract in java?
While an abstract class can define both abstract and non-abstract methods, an interface can have only abstract methods. Another way interfaces differ from abstract classes is that interfaces have very little flexibility in how the methods and variables defined in the interface are declared. These rules are strict: • All interface methods are implicitly public and abstract. In other words, you do not need to actually type the public or abstract modifiers in the method declaration, but the method is still always public and abstract. (You can use any kind of modifiers in the Abstract class) • All variables defined in an interface must be public, static, and final-in other words, interfaces can declare only constants, not instance variables. • Interface methods must not be static. • Because interface methods are abstract, they cannot be marked final, strictfp, or native. (More on these modifiers later.) • An interface can extend one or more other interfaces. • An interface cannot extend anything but another interface. • An interface cannot implement another interface or class. • An interface must be declared with the keyword interface. You must remember that all interface methods are public and abstract regardless of what you see in the interface definition.
Abstract class vs interface?
Comparison between an Abstract Class and an Interface:While an abstract class can define both abstract and non-abstract methods, an interface can have only abstract methods. Another way interfaces differ from abstract classes is that interfaces have very little flexibility in how the methods and variables defined in the interface are declared. These rules are strict:
How do you code to inherit from an interface in java?
We have been using references to the term "Implementing an Interface" throughout the preceding chapters and we havent yet actually dug deep into this topic. As you might remember, an Interface is nothing but a contract as to how a class should behave. It just declares the behavior as empty methods and the implementing class actually writes the code that will determine the behavior. When you implement an interface, you're agreeing to adhere to the contract defined in the interface. That means you're agreeing to provide legal implementations for every method defined in the interface, and that anyone who knows what the interface methods look like can rest assured that they can invoke those methods on an instance of your implementing class. (Thy need not bother much about how you have implemented it. All they bother about is whether a method of the name mentioned in the interface is available or not) Now, you might stop me and ask, what if I implement an interface and opt not to write code for a method that I am supposed to? The answer is simple. The compiler wouldn't let you do that. You cannot successfully implement an interface without providing method implementation for all the methods declared inside the interface. This is how the java system ensures that when someone knows a certain method name in an interface and has an instance of a class that implements it, can actually call that method without fear that the method isn't implemented inside the class. Assuming an interface, Convertible, with two methods: openHood(), and setOpenHoodFactor(), the following class will compile: public class Ball implements Convertible { // Keyword 'implements' public void openHood() { } public void setOpenHoodFactor(int bf) { } } Ok, I know what you are thinking now. "This has got to be the worst implementation class that you have seen". Though it compiles and runs as well, it is actually doing nothing… the interface contract guarantees that the class implementing it will have a method of a particular name but it never guaranteed a good implementation. In other words, the compiler does not bother whether you have code inside your method or not. All it cares is if you have methods of the matching names as in the interface. That's all… Implementation classes must adhere to the same rules for method implementation as a class extending an abstract class. In order to be a legal implementation class, a nonabstract implementation class must do the following: • Provide concrete (nonabstract) implementations for all methods from the declared interface. • Follow all the rules for legal overrides. • Declare no checked exceptions on implementation methods other than those declared by the interface method, or subclasses of those declared by the interface method. • Maintain the signature of the interface method, and maintain the same return type (or a subtype). • It does not have to declare the exceptions declared in the interface method declaration.
What is cloneable interface?
Cloneable is a TAGGED or MARKER interfaceA class implements the Cloneable interface to indicate to the Object.clone() method that it is legal for that method to make a field-for-field copy of instances of that class.The interface Cloneable declares no methods.Attempts to clone instances that do not implement the Cloneable interface result in the exception CloneNotSupportedException being thrown.You want to override clone() to make it public instead of protected. For example, public Object clone() throws CloneNotSupportedException {return super.clone();}If all your clone() methods call super.clone(), as is recommended, then eventually it will get passed up the inheritance chain all the way to Object.clone() to do the actual cloning, which is why you want to implement the Cloneable interface, so Object.clone() will agree to do it.If it does not get passed to Object.clone() eventually, then you do not need to implement Cloneable.
How do you create an interface?
by declaring in the header of the class: public/private interface [interfaceName] and do not write any method body(i.e. public void dance();)
Simple example in interface?
Any device or construct that allows a human being to interact with a machine is an interface. The steering wheel of a car is an interface, the play button on a DVD video player is an interface, the close icon on a window is an interface, the CTRL+C accelerator is an interface, and so on.
