What if means simply is that if you can't converse on the subject with some one, you can still call him names and he will get into an argument with him...to your mutual satisfaction. The premise is that you might not know the subject, but if you redirect his thoughts to defense, you have won the argument by making him lose his train of thought.
A valid argument is certainly stronger than an invalid argument. but an argument can be valid and still be relatively weak. Validity and strength are not the same, although they are both good features for an argument to have.
the invalid argument is argument which is not based on any justification to justify the argument. Whereas, unsound argument is based on little justification but does not fully match with the ground on which the argument is based
His entire speech was fallacious, as none of his contentions was backed by evidence.A fallacious argument can still carry weight if it seems plausible.
Martin Luther King Jr's speech I Have a Dream is an example of a Rogerian argument. So is a speech by Frederick Douglass called "What to the Slave is Fourth of July?" Both of them are still being respectful to another's opinion, but they have their own viewpoint as well. They leave it to the audience to make their assumption about what is right whithiut putting the opposite opinion down.
Answer this question… Even savvy computer users still have their privacy violated from time to time, which suggests that people still need all the help they can get.
Elbert Hubbard
Yes, the Relief Pitcher named Scott Elbert is still with the Los Angeles Dodgers however as of April 20, 2013, Scott Elbert currently remains on the 15-day Disabled List. He was placed on the Disabled List on March 22, 2013 due to him recovering from his left elbow surgery.
No, an argument cannot be void. An argument can be weak, flawed, or unconvincing, but it still retains its basic structure and content. A void argument would imply that there is no argument at all.
Scientology is the religion that practices Dianetics. It was found by science fiction writer L. Ron Hubbard in 1952. Hubbard died in 1986, but the religion still has many followers today.
A valid argument is certainly stronger than an invalid argument. but an argument can be valid and still be relatively weak. Validity and strength are not the same, although they are both good features for an argument to have.
the invalid argument is argument which is not based on any justification to justify the argument. Whereas, unsound argument is based on little justification but does not fully match with the ground on which the argument is based
Maybe ha's still mad at you........
Yes, a valid argument can still be weak if the premises provided are not strong or relevant enough to support the conclusion. Validity refers to the logical structure of an argument, while the strength of an argument refers to the quality and persuasiveness of the premises.
The still pot
Because bullets is the only way to end an argument at a stand still.
Valid arguments are not described as strong or weak. Validity refers to the logical structure of an argument - if the premises logically lead to the conclusion. An argument can be valid but still weak if the premises are not well-supported or sound.
He could mean if you still like each other