What if means simply is that if you can't converse on the subject with some one, you can still call him names and he will get into an argument with him...to your mutual satisfaction. The premise is that you might not know the subject, but if you redirect his thoughts to defense, you have won the argument by making him lose his train of thought.
A valid argument is certainly stronger than an invalid argument. but an argument can be valid and still be relatively weak. Validity and strength are not the same, although they are both good features for an argument to have.
the invalid argument is argument which is not based on any justification to justify the argument. Whereas, unsound argument is based on little justification but does not fully match with the ground on which the argument is based
His entire speech was fallacious, as none of his contentions was backed by evidence.A fallacious argument can still carry weight if it seems plausible.
Martin Luther King Jr's speech I Have a Dream is an example of a Rogerian argument. So is a speech by Frederick Douglass called "What to the Slave is Fourth of July?" Both of them are still being respectful to another's opinion, but they have their own viewpoint as well. They leave it to the audience to make their assumption about what is right whithiut putting the opposite opinion down.
Answer this question… Even savvy computer users still have their privacy violated from time to time, which suggests that people still need all the help they can get.
Elbert Hubbard
Yes, the Relief Pitcher named Scott Elbert is still with the Los Angeles Dodgers however as of April 20, 2013, Scott Elbert currently remains on the 15-day Disabled List. He was placed on the Disabled List on March 22, 2013 due to him recovering from his left elbow surgery.
Scientology is the religion that practices Dianetics. It was found by science fiction writer L. Ron Hubbard in 1952. Hubbard died in 1986, but the religion still has many followers today.
A valid argument is certainly stronger than an invalid argument. but an argument can be valid and still be relatively weak. Validity and strength are not the same, although they are both good features for an argument to have.
the invalid argument is argument which is not based on any justification to justify the argument. Whereas, unsound argument is based on little justification but does not fully match with the ground on which the argument is based
Maybe ha's still mad at you........
The still pot
Because bullets is the only way to end an argument at a stand still.
0.25
He could mean if you still like each other
In C++ there is no such thing as a parameter, there are only arguments, both actual and formal. Some languages use the term parameter to mean a formal argument and argument to mean an actual argument, while others reverse the meanings completely. Some languages make no distinction at all and use the terms parameter and argument interchangeably. However, C++ is quite clear on this: actual arguments are the names that you pass to a function, while formal arguments are the names received by the function. Even so, you will still encounter incorrect usage of the terms parameter and arguments, even by C++ experts (myself included!) The following example code demonstrates the difference between an actual argument and a formal argument, as the terms apply in C++: int foo(int formal) { return(formal*2); } void bar(int& formal) { formal*=2; } int main() { int actual=1; actual = foo(actual); bar(actual); return(0); } The function foo() declares a formal argument by value while bar() declares a formal argument by reference. In main() we declare a variable with the name actual and pass this actual argument to both functions in turn. When we pass actual to foo(), the value of actual is assigned to formal. Since formal is a copy of actual, they are separate names with separate values (initially they will have the same value of course). Thus any changes made to formal will have no effect on actual, hence we must assign the return value from foo() to actual in main(), in order to record the change made by foo(). When we pass actual to bar(), a reference to actual is assigned to formal. A reference is simply an alternate name for the same argument, however the name actual is not visible to bar(), so they are still separate names, but they always have the same value. Thus any changes to formal will affect actual, thus there is no need to assign any return value to record the change.
They have had a public argument and aren't on very good terms.