0
I think you mean constituent.
The noun constituent is an element or component; a person who authorizes another to act on their behalf; or an element of grammar.
The adjective constituent describes serving to form, compose, or make up a unit or a whole; having the power to frame, enact, or amend a constitution or create a government.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Wiki User
∙ 15y agoSomeone who can elect another representative.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the main contituent of cytoplasm?
water(90%)
What is the constituent element of oil?
the contituent elements of oil are *carbon *hydrogen *sulfur *nitrogen
What are three types of public policy in US government?
distributive redistributive conflict regulatory contituent bargaining
What is contituent metals of bronze?
Do you mean 'constituents'? if so then the answer is Bronze primarily consists of copper, usually with tin as the main additive. It is hard and brittle, and it was particularly significant in antiquity
What is the contituent elements of fats?
Fat constitute elements that are chemical (organic solvents) that are in general insoluble in water .Chemically, fats are triglycerides of glycerol and other sevral fatty acids.
What is it called when businesses combine?
when a number of business undertakings combine together for enjoying some benefits, a business combination forms. The contituent units come into an agreement for fixing up the terms and conditions.
How are the properties of an alloy different from those of the contituent metals?
Alloys can differ in any way from the constituent elements. For example Bronze (Copper and Tin) is harder than either and I think it even has a higher melting temperature than both.
What does Sodium chloride do in agar?
NaCl is a constituent of many media require for the growth of mcirobial culture it has a significance that it provide the osmotic balance i.e. it helps in osmoregulation and also in transport of material in and out of the microbial cell (active transprot) Although it has been observed that in prokaryotic microbial cultures( except fungi) it is not necessary to add sodium chloride in basic media like nutrient agar because of the already presence of these ions in beef extract, yeast extract or other natural contituent.
Why is spilling 1 M acetic acid relatively harmless compared to spilling 1 M hydrochloric acid?
Acetic acid is much weaker than hydrochloric acid. Weak acids do not fully dissociate into their contituent ions, so there will be a smaller concentration of H+ ions in 1 M acetic acid than in 1 M hydrochloric acid (even though the concentrations of the two acids are the same). It's the H+ ions that burn your skin - that do the damge. So, a small concentration of H+ ions, which is what we have in 1 M acetic acid, will therefore be pretty safe.
Discuss the difference between the American and british constitution?
The United Kingdom has no single, written document that forms its constitution. The guiding principles of British government are contained in a variety of statutes and treaties. The fundaments of British constitutional law are Parlimentary sovereignty and the rule of law: that is, the ultimate law of the United Kingdom is that enacted by Parliament, and that those laws apply to all persons equally. There are complications as a result of a lack of codification in this area; for instance, Parliament has passed laws granting former colonies independence -- the repeal of these laws, despite Parliament's status as the ultimate law of the land, would almost certainly not result in the repeal of independence. The UK is also a unitary state, meaning that all other lawmaking bodies in the country (for example, Welsh and Scottish Parliaments) gain their authority from acts of British Parliament. This differs from the United States, in that the US is a federation, and its constituent states have lawmaking bodies that are not granted authority by the central, federal government, thus making it possible for contituent states to have laws that differ broadly from federal law in certain respects. Further, the US Constitution provides for three "separate but equal" branches of government: the Executive (the President, Cabinet, and so on), the Legislative (the Congress), and the Judicial (federal and supreme courts). British government does not function in this way; its executive power and cabinet are drawn from the Parliament itself. There is no unified judicial branch -- England and Wales share one, Scotland has its own, as does Northern Ireland -- and it is under the authority of Her Majesty's Government, ie, the Executive. All acts of Parliament are technically equal; because there is no codified Constitution, it cannot be amended. The British Bill of Rights, passed in the late 17th Century, was influential on the later American Bill of Rights, though there are significant differences: there is no right to freedom of speech outside Parliament, for instance.
What happens to ionic and covalent compounds when they are dissolved in water?
Water is a very good solvent. When an ionic compound is dissolved in water, it breaks into its contituent radical ions. say for example if you dissolve NaCl in water, then it decomposes into Na+ & Cl- another example, when (Na)2SO4 is dissolevd in water it dissolves into two Na+ ion and one SO4- ion.
What were the root causes of World War 2 what two countries gained the most from the War other than Japan and Germany what countries lost the most as a result of World War 2?
It is interesting that the countries which lost the war, Germany and Japan, are the ones you identify as having gained the most from the war. While these countries certainly did gain something, which is, they gained democratic governments rather than the crazy dictatorships which they had during WW II, they made this progress at an extremely high cost. Many Germans and Japanese died in the war, and it took a long time to rebuild those countries, which were heavily bombed and suffered enormous devastation (in the case of Japan, let us remember, two cities, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, were bombed with atomic bombs). I am quite sure that neither country recalls the war as being a good experience, or is pleased that they had fought it. Germany also bears a crushing burden of guilt for the Holocaust, which has stained the German collective soul very deeply (I am tempted to say forever, but I know that sooner or later, all things get forgotten). Both the US and the USSR emerged from WW II in a much strengthened position - but that only resulted in the long running and very destructive competition of the Cold War, in which both jockeyed for world domination, at great cost. So, they gained something from the war, but in the long run it didn't really give them what they wanted. The USSR is now gone, having broken up into its 16 contituent republics, and the US is struggling with several wars and overwhelming economic problems. Its dominant role as the great victor of WW II has largely faded away. Poland suffered particularly badly during the war. Its large Jewish population was almost entirely slaughtered, and the infamous Auschwitz death camp was located in Poland. Even the non-Jewish Poles were not treated well by the Nazis. England was extensively bombed by Germany and had to fight very desperately for its survival. They lost a lot during the war, but did emerge with a strengthened sense of national pride. So, they won something and lost something. But to honestly reply to your question, even those who won something in WW II paid too high a price. The war was a global catastrophe for everyone. The Holocaust led directed to the revival of Zionism by the surviving Jews, and that in turn has led to the ongoing Arab-Israeli conflict which is the root cause of much of the conflict that now rages between the Islamic and non-Islamic worlds. The consequences of WW II continue to be felt.
