To get a definition you can go to Google.com and type in the words define isomorphism or whatever you want defined. isomorphismA map or function taking a structure A (such as a group, ring, field, etc.) exactly onto another similar structure B , so that both A (considered as a substructure of B ) and B look exactly the same. In other words, an isomorphism is an embedding that is surjective as well as injective.
See the Related Link.
Identical atoms of other elements.A balanced category is a category in which every bimorphism is an isomorphism.
An automorphism is an isomorphism of a mathematical object or system of objects onto itself.
7 groups, use the structure theorem
both shows isomorphism properties i.e electron groupings are similiar !
Harold Simmons has written: 'Derivation and computation' -- subject(s): Curry-Howard isomorphism, Lambda calculus, Proof theory, Type theory
10 = 2*5, a product of 2 primes, and 2 divides (5-1). So there are only two groups.
The type of selection that removes the fringe from both ends of phenotype distribution and establishing a means or average. Genetic diversity decreases and there is a stabilization on a particular trait.
There are 5 groups of order 8 up to isomorphism. 3 abelian ones (C8, C4xC2, C2xC2xC2) and 2 non-abelian ones (dihedral group D8 and quaternion group Q)
Compounds are said to be isomorphic when the crystals have the same form. In crystallographic terms this means having the same space group. The best known examples are perhaps the alums and the double sulfates, Tutton's salts. The crystals of the different compounds are very similar.
because it is dependent upon the way of combination of atoms in isomorphs.for example NaNO3 and KNO3 have same atomic ratios. Because both Na and K belong 1 grup and give only one electron for bond formation.
In 1898, Bianchi worked out the Bianchi classification of nine possible isometry classes of three-dimensional Lie groups of isometries of a (sufficiently symmetric) Riemannian manifold. Bianchi knew this is essentially the same thing as classifying, up to isomorphism, the three-dimensional real Lie algebras.
It is a consequence of the isomorphism between powers of numbers under multiplication and their indices under addition. This leads to the definition of x-a as the [multiplicative] inverse of xa. Then xa * x-a = xa-a = x0 But since x-a is the inverse of xa, their product is 1. That is to say, x0 = 1.