plaigarism
Presenting common knowledge (such as the law of gravity) without citing a source
Citing
No, citing the wrong source is simply an error. Plagiarism is failing to cite a source, so that you are presenting someone else's work as your own.
yes,because the ideas are not yours
Rhetorical acts in paragraphs are acknowledgment of sources. It is when you cite your sources in the paragraph along with citing them at the end.
Properly citing references (in footnotes, endnotes, and/or a bibliography) includes the copyright information.
No. Under Section §106A. (Rights of certain authors to attribution and integrity) of US Copyright Law the author has the right to credit for his/her/their work. Additionally, using someone elses work without properly citing the source would leave you open to a claim of plagiarism.
No. Under Section §106A. (Rights of certain authors to attribution and integrity) of US Copyright Law the author has the right to credit for his/her/their work. Additionally, using someone elses work without properly citing the source would leave you open to a claim of plagiarism.
Plagiarism.
No, you need to know them if you're going to do the project or you need to inform them.
That is correct. In MLA style, titles of books are italicized rather than underlined when citing them in text.
One can check how to properly write a heading in MLA format by going to the Easy Bib website. The website provides citations if information is input, which can be used to cross check citing against.
Yes, when citing a website in APA format, you should remove hyperlinks. Simply include the URL without making it clickable.
Citing
Yes, not citing the sources of information that you used in your paper is considered plagiarism. It is important to properly credit the original authors to avoid plagiarism and give them the recognition they deserve for their work.
"Writing without citing" is worst than overcitation, or even under-citation. But too much citation would undermine your own research, and perhaps, it is a bigger sin to mis-cite; say, you are citing about someone who didn't say what you have penned down. Or, similarly, miscitation or wrongful citation about a phrase which you have written, you have by mistake wrongly cited someone (the author who never said or meant anything like that) what you have written, and then wrongfully cited him or her. Which means, you just passed down your own thoughts as others claiming deceitful evidence or credits. It is also better to search for similarities of your own ideas coinciding with others who have penned down any such before you, even if that is your own though. Not citing such means, you are the first one to think and get the idea which exist but you never would have been cared. This is blatant overlook and hence-unintentional plagiarism. This is opposite intentional lazy work- of not citing the original source as because you have not properly search for the references. Hence, perhaps, overcitation is better than misscitation or not at all.
Citing is done to give the originator credit for the information used.