Is it possible for an operational definition to be valid but not reliable
Information has been uncovered about the Battle of the Little Bighorn
A deductively valid argument is if the premises are true then the conclusion is certainly true, not possibly true. The definition does not say that the conclusion is true.
An argument that is strong, sound, and valid is a cogent one.
Cash inflow - Cash flowing into the business from all sources over a period of time.
Is it possible for an operational definition to be valid but not reliable
cheese
no it does not complt with the definition of a cheque and its not a valid negotiable instrument
Information has been uncovered about the Battle of the Little Bighorn
The ending of the fixed period for which a contract is valid.
the person or persons who rule a country
block:ready->running
A deductively valid argument is if the premises are true then the conclusion is certainly true, not possibly true. The definition does not say that the conclusion is true.
The most valid sources of knowledge are first person sources. These are sources where the information originates and hasn't been altered by anyone else. This information can often be found in autobiographies or from the person themselves.
Fair and acceptable are both definitions for valid
One can find the definition of the word "addiction" on a variety of online sources. Such sources include Psychology Today, Wiktionary, Dictionary, and Wikipedia.
The statement "A 150 angle a converse" is not a valid definition. It appears to be a combination of terms that doesn't convey a clear meaning. A "150 angle" refers to an angle measuring 150 degrees, while "converse" typically pertains to the reversal of a statement or theorem in logic. To be a valid definition, it would need to clearly define a specific concept without ambiguity.