Recusal or judicial disqualification.
No, it is a noun. An adjective is a describer word like 'pretty' or 'interesting' A noun is a person, place, thing, or idea. In this case, a thing.
A juror should never judge a case before knowing all of the facts. Prejudging interferes with giving a hearing to both the prosecution and defense.
"Precedent" means "that which comes before". In making an interpretation of the law, judges will examine the decisions of judges who decided similar cases. If the case is sufficiently similar (the legal term for this is "on point"), the judge will adopt the reasoning of the earlier judge. This is called following a precedent.
That depenfds on the Court involved. A judge who imposes a sentence cannot change it once it has been imposed. However, if a case is appealed to a higher court - by either side - then the judge can change the sentence, or even strike it out altogether.
The sentence " He made himself nothing," has two meanings, either that he made nothing of himself, or made nothing for himself. In the former case, nothing is a predicate nominative linked to the subject through a copula verb to make(oneself). In the latter, nothing is the accusative direct object of a transitive verb to make.
He files a motion for an order to have the Judge recuse himself from the case.
Recuse is what a judge does when he or she excuses himself or herself from hearing a case based on reasons that might prevent the judge from ruling impartially or just appear like he or she is ruling impartially. For example if a case involved a relative in some way, the judge should recuse himself or herself from hearing the case.
No
"Excuse" means to forgive or justify a fault or offense, while "recuse" means to disqualify oneself from a situation due to a conflict of interest. Essentially, to excuse is to pardon, while to recuse is to abstain or withdraw.
Normally by order of the court either by a finding by the judge or a verdict by a jury.
Yes. But normally such a judge, if he remembers you, will recuse himself from the case. The judge that signs a search warrant will not necessarily be the judge that tries you.
if your case is directly related to another case then a "case citing" is extremely important, especially if it was the same judge, a judge will not rule against himself so if he has ruled one way before he'll rule the same this time.
You, or your attorney, should file a motion for the judge to recuse himself from your case. You should accompany your request with some hard facts and reasoning that makes you believe the judge could not render a fair opinion in your case.
WRAL Murder Trials - 2003 Michael Peterson Case Judge SBI agent misrepresented himself evidence was released on: USA: 9 May 2012
A successful close to a judge typically means that the attorney effectively summarized their case, highlighted key points, addressed counterarguments, and left a lasting impression that supports their position. It should leave the judge feeling confident in the attorney's argument and evidence presented.
When the judge himself or herself initiates an action against a person or company for a violation of law about which nobody has lodged any complaint to any public authority -- but about which judge has himself came to know through personal experience. Suppose a person slaps another man in open road and suddenly a judge sees that incident -- now even if nobody has complained to the police about this incident or nobody has told the judge about this incident -- but as the judge has himself seen this incident--he can initiate action against that person himself in a court of law Such a case is known as "Suomoto case". Suomoto cases generally end up in the conviction of the person against whom the action is initiated. The chances of acquittal in such cases are very minor.
When the judge himself or herself initiates an action against a person or company for a violation of law about which nobody has lodged any complaint to any public authority -- but about which judge has himself came to know through personal experience. Suppose a person slaps another man in open road and suddenly a judge sees that incident -- now even if nobody has complained to the police about this incident or nobody has told the judge about this incident -- but as the judge has himself seen this incident--he can initiate action against that person himself in a court of law Such a case is known as "Suomoto case". Suomoto cases generally end up in the conviction of the person against whom the action is initiated. The chances of acquittal in such cases are very minor.