After every use.
'In the hope that' is the correct phrase.
This is not a sentence it is a phrase and as a phrase it is correct.
I believe that the term "With accordance..." is not necessarily a correct phrase. When referring to accordance, one is not with accordance, one would be in accordance. Thus, the term "In accordance..." would be a better phrase to use. For example: "In accordance with the treaty of Versailles..."
The correct phrase is used to. I was used to working late. Used to being rejected, I barely spoke to anyone.
If you use every part of a pig except the squeal, you use everything.
It depends on how you use the phrase: Can you provide me a copy of your CV? - correct
That is the correct spelling of "phrase" (word group, or to use specific words).
Yes. It cleverly suggests correct use and wrongful use.
The correct phrase is "every once in a while." It means occasionally or from time to time.
"Have been" is the correct phrase to use. "Have being" is not grammatically correct.
The correct phrase is "you had to leave." "Leave" is the correct verb form to use after "had to."
The detective positioned himself in the shadows of some bushes, from where the suspect was observable.
The correct phrase to use depends on the context of the sentence. "To be" is used as an infinitive verb phrase, while "to being" is not grammatically correct in standard English. For example, "I like to be alone" is correct, while "I like to being alone" is not.
Yes
No, the phrase "had went" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "had gone," using the past participle of "go" after the auxiliary verb "had."
"as a result" is the correct phrase to use. "As the result" is not grammatically correct.
The correct phrase is "used to visit." This is used to talk about an action that was done habitually or regularly in the past but no longer occurs. "I used to visit my grandparents every summer when I was a child."